Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 097 Amisfield Environment Protection Group v Central Otago District Council [pdf, 21 MB]

   ...on the State Highway (as detailed in advice notes a to c) . 1 Advice Note: a. It is a requirement of the Government Roading Powers Act 1989 that any person wanting to carry out works on a state highway first gain the approval of Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency for the works and that a Corridor Access Request (CAR) is applied for before any works commence. A CAR will be required for the right turn bay formation works within State Highway 6. b. Detailed design approval fro...

2. [2013] NZEmpC 106 Pacific Flight Catering Ltd v Service and Food Workers Union [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...to the employer as Pacific Flight Catering or PFC. [5] PRIFCL, as a separate legal entity and trading under the name Pacific Flight Catering, formerly held the catering contracts for Singapore Airlines. This contract was to provide catering services to Singapore Airlines for flights from New Zealand. Singapore Airlines put the contract up for tender. The successful tenderer was LSG Sky Chefs NZ Limited (LSG) and that company took over the catering services to Singapore Airlines...

3. Waipa-District-Council.pdf [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...RIVERS) to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN AUCKLAND-WAIKATO AND EASTERN FISH AND GAME COUNCILS (ENV-2020-AKL-0000101) DAIRYNZ LIMITED (ENV-2020-AKL-000097) DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2020-AKL-000096) FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV-2020-AKL-0000102) ___________________________________________________________ NOTICE OF WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL’S WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS ____________________________________________________...

4. Popa v Canterbury University (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...She did not point to any evidence that her Romanian nationality has been a factor in failing to obtain work at the University other than the absence of any Romanian employees there. Jurisdiction to strike out [13] The Tribunal has in recent cases addressed its jurisdiction to strike out proceedings. Examples include Parohinog v Yellow Pages Group Ltd (Strike-Out Application No. 2) [2015] NZHRRT 14 (5 May 2015) at [21] to [33], New Zealand Private Prosecution Services Ltd v Key (Strike...

5. [2019] NZEmpC 143 Sfizio Ltd v Freeborn [pdf, 420 KB]

   ...entity and would breach company law principles that the corporate veil may not be pierced; and that in any event, Ms Freeborn’s employment agreement was validly terminated under a 90-day trial provision. [6] Careful submissions have been filed addressing the joinder issue; essentially, each submission develops the grounds of application on the one hand, and the grounds of opposition on the other. Oral submissions have also been presented.

6. [2018] NZEnvC 169 Te Runanga o Ngati Awa v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...under s 8 of the Act, the iwi whom TRONIT and NPES represent are entitled to their own recognition. These are matters of advantage or disadvantage to these iwi. [20] Any question of remoteness will likely depend on the particular issues to be addressed at a substantive hearing and on the positions that the parties may take on those issues. All parties can expect that the Court will be concerned to ensure that the scope of the issues will be defined in good time prior to the hearing...

7. LCRO 74/2020 NS v AD (29 January 2021) [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...the [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) dated 9 April 2020, in which the Committee made findings of unsatisfactory conduct against him, censured, fined and ordered him to refund fees to Ms AD. [2] Ms AD’s original complaint to the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (Complaints Service) concerned three separate pieces of legal work that Mr NS had carried out on her behalf: her late husband’s estate; the sale of her property and immigration issues (the immigra...

8. CL & ZA v GU LCRO 148/2013 (25 May 2016) [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...contraventions of the Act and practice rules made under it. Analysis [30] Lawyers’ conduct is regulated in light of the purposes of the Act set out in s 3 of the Act which are to: (a) maintain public confidence in the provision of legal services…; (b) protect consumers of legal services…; (c) recognise the status of the legal profession…. [31] A purposive approach is to be adopted when consideration is given to the application of the Act and rules made under i...

9. Bowater - Pouto 2F (2008) 123 Whangarei MB 184 (123 WH 184) [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...trust Where the dividend payable is under $20,00 (i,e the beneficial owner holds less than 10 shares) the dividend will not be paid but will be held by the trust I was told that 36 beneficial owners hold less than 10 shares. The trustees have not addressed how any undistributed dividends are to be managed. [7] The proposed dividend will effectively dispose of the stumpage payments received to date and will leave the trust with approximately $80,000.00 in the bank 'nle trustees

10. [2025] NZLVT 028 – Edwards v Minister for Land Information (17 June 2025) [pdf, 406 KB]

    ...$296,960 plus interest and costs to be calculated. The Tribunal award did not include costs, disbursements or interest, or consider s 66 claims. Nor did it include any of the s 66 claims for disturbance, which had been outlined in the claim but not addressed in any way at the hearing. The Minister says that they do have arguments in respect of the s 66 claims but have not advanced them. This appears to be on the basis of an argument that claims 4 Minister of Works and Develo...