Search Results

1. Genesis Energy Limited 94 [pdf, 71 KB]

   BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS N J GARVAN / H G WATSON AUCKLAND LEVEL 22, VERO CENTRE, 48 SHORTLAND STREET PO BOX 1149, AUCKLAND 1140, DX CP20509, NEW ZEALAND TEL 64 9 916 8800 FAX 64 9 916 8801 EMAIL NATASHA.GARVAN@BELLGULLY.COM / HANNAH.WATSON@BELLGULLY.COM In the Environment Court I Mua I Te Kōti Taiao O Aotearoa ENV-2020-AKL-000094 Auckland Registry Tāmaki Makaurau Rohe In the matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 And in the matter of an application under Sectio...

2. BORA COVID-19 Response (Taxation and Social Assistance Urgent Measures) Bill [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...assist in the Government’s response to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak. The Bill includes both measures targeted at providing relief to those that have been economically affected by the outbreak, as well as untargeted measures to address the wider economic impacts of the outbreak. 5. Notably, the Bill amends the Income Tax Act 2007 to: • remove the hours of work test from the in-work tax credit scheme, and to expand eligibility to those in receipt of an emergency ben...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 84 Robinson v Pacific Seals New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 197 KB]

   ALAN ROBINSON v PACIFIC SEALS NEW ZEALAND LTD NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2015] NZEmpC 84 [9 June 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2015] NZEmpC 84 WRC 26/14 IN THE MATTER OF an application for rehearing BETWEEN ALAN ROBINSON Applicant AND PACIFIC SEALS NEW ZEALAND LTD Respondent Hearing: 13 May 2015 Appearances: T Kennedy, counsel for applicant J Tannahill, counsel for respondent Judgment: 9 June 2015...

4. Auckland Standards Committee v Fendall [2012] NZLCDT 1 [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...decision records the oral decision given at the hearing regarding suppression and notes the Tribunal’s reasons for that decision, and determines penalty and costs. Background [4] The charge arose following investigations by the Legal Services Agency into invoices Ms Fendall had rendered for her professional services in respect of attendances as duty solicitor, and for legal aid and youth advocacy attendances. [5] An initial investigation into invoices Ms Fendall had issued t...

5. [2021] NZEmpC 217 Humphreys v Humphreys and Chief Executive of the Ministry of Health [pdf, 368 KB]

   PETER HUMPHREYS v SIAN JIMENEZ HUMPHREYS [2021] NZEmpC 217 [8 December 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 217 EMPC 471/2019 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN PETER HUMPHREYS Plaintiff AND SIAN JIMENEZ HUMPHREYS First Defendant by her litigation guardian, L Meys AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH...

6. LCRO 20/2016 LC and CM v JP (19 March 2019) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...neither of them instructed Mr JP to sign the authority so the deposit could be released from the agents’ trust account before the statutory 10 working days had passed. Mr LC also says that in conversation with Mr JP in [foreign language], Mr JP addressed him in a way he found offensive. The applicants want Mr JP to pay each of them of $25,000 representing part of their lost deposit. [16] Mr JP says Mr LC instructed him to sign the authority and he acted in accordance with that...

7. P Ltd v Q Ltd [2021] NZDT 1643 (8 October 2021) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...cannot be recovered. 8. I now turn to whether or not the agreement included P Ltd retaining the originals, and if not, whether P Ltd breached the contract by refusing to return them. I had regard to KN’s evidence that the price charged for the service appears to be at the higher end, indicating the price did not take into account a deduction for the value of retaining the near new originals. However, despite this, price alone is not definitive. For example, the Tribunal would not o...

8. BORA Railways Bill [pdf, 34 KB]

   ..."reasonableness" of a power of search and seizure. 9. We understand that the powers in clauses 46 and 47 of the Bill are necessary to give effect to the proposed new safety system, audit and inspection process, and incident reporting process. A failure to address these deficiencies will impact on safety for rail employees and the public. 10. The Bill contains a number of safeguards on the exercise of the powers. For example, the Bill provides that: • safety assessors are o...

9. Coxon v New Zealand Law Society [2010] NZLCDT 1 [pdf, 240 KB]

   1 NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No. [2010] NZLCDT 1 LCDT 024/09 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 MELANIE COXON Applicant AND NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY Respondent CHAIR Mr D J Mackenzie MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr J Clarke Mr W Smith Mr B M Stanaway Mr O W Vaughan HEARING at Auckland on 8 December 2009 APP...

10. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Arman [2019] NZLCDT 18 [pdf, 340 KB]

    NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2019] NZLCDT 18 LCDT 006/19 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND ARLAN ARMAN Respondent CHAIR Judge DF Clarkson MEMBERS Ms J Gray Mr S Hunter Ms C Rowe Mr W Smith ON THE PAPERS DATE OF DECISION 8 July 2019 COUNSEL Ms C Paterson and Ms E Mok for the Standards Committee Respondent - Self-Repr...