Search Results

1. [2011] NZEmpC 95 Walker v Procare Health Ltd [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...question and the involvement of the respective counsel, I accept that this is not a situation where Mr Harrison has disqualified himself from acting for the defendant. The same would apply to Mr Gardiner if Ms Walker had still been able to retain his services. The correspondence between counsel is not at issue and was, as I have indicated, unexceptional. What is at issue in this case, is the conduct of the employer and employee and whether the dismissal was justified in terms of...

2. EQ v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 175 (27 June 2023) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...acceptable quality because he has had two problems with it in the first 18 months. The belt stopped going around in June 2022 and F Ltd did fix the problem. About one month later it would not go up and down properly. EQ says that he filled out an online service request form, but has not has a response, so F Ltd has not carried out a repair. EQ said the repair technician for the first fault told him the repair would not be covered under warranty because regular maintenance was not followed,...

3. LCRO 007/2017 NT YR v HV [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...and obtained the necessary information with little difficulty. The complainants consider Mr HV’s conduct in that regard was dilatory. The second major issue for the complainants relates to Mr HV’s response to their concerns over how best to address the entitlements of two beneficiaries who were minors. Responsibly, the complainants wanted to ensure the inheritances were not frittered away. They consider the fact that Mr HV did not identify all of the options that were available to...

4. [2012] NZEmpC 197 Maritime Union of NZ v Ports of Auckland Ltd [pdf, 71 KB]

   MARITIME UNION OF NEW ZEALAND V PORTS OF AUCKLAND LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 197 [20 November 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 197 ARC 3/12 IN THE MATTER OF injunction BETWEEN MARITIME UNION OF NEW ZEALAND Plaintiff AND PORTS OF AUCKLAND LIMITED Defendant ARC 5/12 AND IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed BETWEEN MARITIME UNION OF NEW ZEALAND Plaintiff AND PORTS OF AUCKLAND LIMITED Defendant H...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 48 Wareing v Tyco New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 76 KB]

   DAVID HUGH WAREING V TYCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC CHCH [2013] NZEmpC 48 [4 April 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 48 CRC 29/12 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN DAVID HUGH WAREING Plaintiff AND TYCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By telephone conference call on 20 September 2012 and by memoranda of submissions filed on 9 and 31 October 2012, 11 and 17 December 201...

6. GT v TL LCRO 05 / 2011 (20 January 2012) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...The Applicant was employed as the chief executive of a community organisation which was governed by a Board. In this role he received a complaint by a staff member which raised a personal grievance. In connection with this the Board sought the services of the Practitioner who was instructed to represent the Board. In this capacity she had dealings with the Applicant. 2 [4] The Practitioner‟s firm had previously acted for the Applicant personally in the 1990s in relation to...

7. Environment Court Topic Structure (with pathway comments) -4.11-2.xlsx [xlsx, 24 KB]

   ...appeal relief Interested s 274 parties Notes ENV-2016-304-000085 ENV-2016-304-000086 PAUP-006/035 Air Quality-AAAQS B7.5.1(4); B7.5.2(7); E14.2(2); E14.3(1); Table E14.3.1; E14.8.2(1). ENV-2016-AKL-000217 Waste Management NZ Ltd All ACI Operations New Zealand Ltd ALSCO New Zealand Ltd Auckland Regional Public Health Service Fulton Hogan Ltd Greater East Tamaki Business Association Inc Mercury NZ Ltd New Zealand Starch Ltd [5 in total] Appeal topic can progress to Court-assisted mediation,...

8. Environment Court annual report 2009 [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...Bollard’s leadership, the court introduced a number of initiatives designed to support the efficient and effective management and disposal of court business. Judge Bollard was highly regarded in both a personal and professional capacity. His dedicated service to New Zealand as a member of the Judiciary for over 20 years is valued and appreciated. Judge Bollard presided over many notable cases of which some are noted below: Augustowicz v Machinery Movers Ltd (1992) 2 NZRMA 20...

9. West & Anor as Trustees of the Christine West Family Trust v Perry [pdf, 769 KB]

   ...making findings on the probable cause of any leaks, and then considering the appropriate remedial work and its costs. 5.2 I will not be considering liability in this section. Also, I will not be referring to the detailed requirements of the New Zealand Building Code, although it may be necessary to mention some aspects of the Code from time to time. Generally, I will be trying to answer the following questions for each alleged leak: Claim No 02368-West...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 23 Greenslade v Jetstar Airways Ltd [pdf, 293 KB]

    ...Zealand is a wholly owned subsidiary of Jetstar Pty Ltd, an Australian registered company which we will refer to as “Jetstar Australia” to distinguish it, where necessary, from the defendant. [4] Jetstar Australia operates passenger airline services from, to and within New Zealand. Mr Greenslade is employed by Jetstar New Zealand as a pilot on Jetstar Australia’s Airbus A320 type aircraft. The aircraft flown by Mr Greenslade and other New Zealand based pilots are registered...