Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 159 Drive Holdings Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   ...of the wider area between Kepa Road and Tamaki Drive. It can be seen that there are Local Centre Zones in St Heliers on Tamaki Drive between Maheke Street and Turua Street and on Kepa Road, near the northern end of Patteson Avenue (known as the New World site). We note for completeness that adjacent to the eastern edge of the application site, the Gordon Spratt Flats have a heritage overlay and represent an important character component of Mission Bay. More generally, the si...

2. [2021] NZEnvC 159 Drive Holdings Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   ...of the wider area between Kepa Road and Tamaki Drive. It can be seen that there are Local Centre Zones in St Heliers on Tamaki Drive between Maheke Street and Turua Street and on Kepa Road, near the northern end of Patteson Avenue (known as the New World site). We note for completeness that adjacent to the eastern edge of the application site, the Gordon Spratt Flats have a heritage overlay and represent an important character component of Mission Bay. More generally, the si...

3. [2021] NZEnvC 072 Moreton v Gisborne District Council [pdf, 922 KB]

   ...not of itself confer some form of inherent jurisdiction on the Court to consider or determine any matter raised with the Court through the s 291 process. Jurisdiction must first be conferred by some other power. [23] Ms Hill noted that only the New Zealand High Court is a court of inherent jurisdiction. The other New Zealand courts (including the Environment Court) do not have inherent jurisdiction.8 The Environment Court is conferred with the same powers that the District Court h...

4. RX v KL LCRO 31/2014 [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...substance and process of the Committee’s determination, has been to: a. Consider all of the available material afresh, including the Committee’s decision; and b. Provide an independent opinion based on those materials. Review issue Conduct, Service and Fee Complaints [17] With the exception of the audio record of the Committee hearing discussed below, I have considered all of the materials available on review. I have identified nothing that suggests a different view should...

5. AA v GQ LCRO 321/2013 [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...necessarily synonymous but this observation by the Court is relevant to the standard that is expected of a lawyer in litigation. (c) What a reasonably competent practitioner would do will of course change with circumstances. As with any professional service which requires the exercise of considerable discretion under demanding circumstances, all that is required is that the barrister act with the degree of care that a practitioner with a reasonable degree of skill and knowledge would...

6. [2021] NZIACDT 3 - DY v Parker (25 February 2021) [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...complainant. There were meetings between the complainant and Mr Zhao, one of which was attended by Ms Cheng. [8] A draft proposal was sent by Mr Zhao to Mr Parker to check on 16 August 2017. [9] At about the same time, the complainant instructed a new licensed immigration adviser, Mr Harris Gu. On 22 August 2017, Mr Gu terminated the complainant’s contract with Swiftvisa, before the application could be filed with Immigration New Zealand. 1 DY v Parker [2020] NZIACDT 54...

7. [2023] NZEnvC 155 Genesis Energy Limited v Waikato District Council [pdf, 413 KB]

   ...26 – 29 of the appeal. 4 the acoustic assessment should be undertaken to address fluctuating noise from the Huntly Power Station); and to be clear to avoid ambiguity. [11] The noise standards in Table 25 are triggered by GRUZ-S14 when a new noise sensitive activity (i.e., dwelling, addition, or alteration) is located within 350m of the Huntly Power Station site boundary. The purpose of the rule is to ensure a new activity is appropriately acoustically insulated from the Hunt...

8. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 52 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 348 KB]

   T E R Ö P Ü WH A K A M A N A I T E T I R I T I O WA I TA N G I. TE MANUTUKUTUKU Director’s Column Northern South Island Inquiry Begins Mapping Officer Commemorates 10 Years Service New Administration Officer Oral History Project Launched Executive Assistant Profile New Report Writer Hearing Schedule New Researchers New Claims Registered Mahuru/Whiringa-ä-Nuku 2000 52 September/October 2000 Waitangi Tribunal Celebrates 25-Year Milestone On 10 October 2000 it will be 25 years...

9. [2025] NZIACDT 35 – TG v Ma (11 July 2025) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...forms. 2. Dishonestly provided to Immigration NZ a false email address for the complainants in the visa application forms. 3. Dishonestly provided to Immigration NZ false employment agreements. 4. Failed to provide to the complainants written services agreements, in breach of cl 18(a) of the Code. 5. Failed to provide to the complainants evidence she was a licensed adviser, in breach of cl 14. 6. Failed to provide to the complainants the visa applications for review before lod...

10. [2022] NZIACDT 19 – TA v Tian (Sanctions) (25 July 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...the relevant time a licensed immigration adviser and director of Abstract Solution Ltd, of Auckland. The Tribunal suspended her licence on 3 November 2020 in response to another complaint.2 [6] The complainant, a national of China, arrived in New Zealand in 2014. He was then 18 years of age. [7] The complainant and his mother engaged the services of Ms Tian to assist with the complainant’s immigration status. Following a number of successful student and visitor visa appli...