Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 127 Taylor v Selwyn District Council [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...elsewhere. 3 The use of the application site as a heliport, by any helicopter as described in condition 2 above including any personal helicopter flights of the consent holder, with the exclusion of helicopter flights under the instruction of an emergency service/agency and frost control on the application site itself, shall be restricted to: a. A maximum of 21 helicopter movements over any 7 day period (an average of 3 movements per day); and b. A maximum of 8 helicopter movements on...

2. [2022] NZEnvC 226 Wellington City Council v Liffey Street Limited [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...adverse effects on the environment. [16] The orders set out in Appendix A are hereby made. [17] The orders shall be served by the Council on the Respondents and do not take effect until they have been served. The Council is to lodge confirmation of service with the Court. [18] Costs are reserved. Any costs application to be made by the Council within 15 working days an to be responded to by the Respondents in accordance with the Environment Co 1rt Practice Note 2014. BP Dwyer...

3. Auckland Standards Committee v Eteuati [2009] NZLCDT 17 [pdf, 81 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No. [2009] NZLCDT 17 LCDT 13/2009 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE Applicant AND BERNADETTE ETEUATI Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr O Vaughan Mr G Craig Ms C Rowe Mr B Smith HEARING at AUCKLAND on 26 November 2009 APPEARANCES Grant Illingworth...

4. LY v [North Island] SC LCRO 231 / 2011 (1 June 2012) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...correspondence on the Standards Committee file, and acknowledged in the following submissions of Counsel:- “The Committee had consistently indicated that the nature of the complaint before it was related to issues arising from an investigation by the New Zealand Law Society Audit Inspectorate. However, the determination of the Committee to refer the matter to the Disciplinary Tribunal was based on a completely different premise, namely that [the Practitioner] did not provide the inf...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 287 Port Taranaki Limited v New Plymouth District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   Port Taranaki Limited v New Plymouth District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 287 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN PORT TARANAKI LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-098) Appellant AND NEW PLYMOUTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case ev...

6. Dotcom v Crown Law Office (Inherent Powers) [2018] NZHRRT 36 [pdf, 401 KB]

   ...be cited as: Dotcom v Crown Law Office (Inherent Powers) [2018] NZHRRT 36. Note publication restrictions.] 2 AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL Second Defendant AND DEPARTMENT OF THE PRIME MINISTER AND CABINET Third Defendant AND IMMIGRATION NEW ZEALAND Fourth Defendant AND MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT Fifth Defendant AND MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE Sixth Defendant AND MINISTRY OF JUSTICE Seventh Defendant AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE...

7. TB v KP LCRO 174/2016 [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...if I do not have a response from you by return then we will deal with this matter by what we regard as proper without further reference to you. [6] There had been no reply to this letter when on 4 April 2016 Mr TB prepared the complaint to the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service. The Complaint [7] The complaint to the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (NZLS) was received on 7 April 2016. The substance of the complaint was that:...

8. XD v MU [2020] NZDT 1311 (14 May 2020) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...District Court [2020] NZDT 1311 APPLICANT XD RESPONDENT MU The Tribunal orders: 1. MU is to pay to XD the sum of $950.00 on or before 30 June 2020. Reasons 1. MU and XD agreed to erect a boundary fence between their new houses. XD paid $2,300.00, being half a quoted sum from ABC Company (ABC). MU then erected the fence in a manner to which XD did not agree. 2. XD sought a partial repayment of his contribution, or a rebuilt fence to agreed specificati...

9. Karaitiana v Seager - Wharetoto 9 Balance Trust (2024) 494 Aotea MB 275 (494 AOT 275) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...issues affecting them both. For Tokoahu the sole issue relates to the status of the lease. For Harvey, the issues are the lease and his performance as a trustee. I am prepared to appoint these lawyers per s 70(3)(b) of the Act and to have their services paid for by the Courts special aid fund per s 98 of the Act, subject to approving estimates. These lawyers may also give advice about the appeal rights that both Tokoahu and Harvey have in respect of the rehearing decision and this...

10. [2025] NZSSAA 17 (29 May 2025) [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...to medical appointments, stay in touch with family, to go shopping and attend to business. The vehicle had a history of needing repairs, and the Ministry had advanced $3,914.06 in the years prior to XXXX lodging this appeal. XXXX is in receipt of New Zealand superannuation, and his only supplementary assistance was the Winter Energy Payment. He had assistance from ACC before he qualified for New Zealand superannuation. [3] The form of assistance that XXXX could have potentially received t...