Search Results

1. 10.5 Appendix E: Media and Reporting Protocol in the Youth Court

   The Youth Court is a division of the District Court. Its proceedings are not open to the public. However, media are legally entitled, and permitted, to attend Youth Court proceedings under 329(1)(l)of  the Oranga  Tamariki  Act1989  (“the  Act”),and  are  welcome  to  do  so. The reporting of Youth Court proceedings is subject to a statutory prohibition against publication, except  with  the leave  of  the  Judge that  heard  the  proceedings. The  Youth  Court  wishes 

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. News & media >
   3. Media centre >
   4. Media information >
   5. Media guide for reporting the courts and tribunals: Edition 4.1 >
   6. 10.0 Appendices

2. MK v PB LCRO 338/2012 (11 July 2014) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...namely that DE would be paid from the proceeds of a successful outcome of the litigation i.e. no success no fee. Mr MK declined to act on this basis. Mr PB’s complaints and the Standards Committee determination [11] Mr PB complained to the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service in November 2011. His complaint was that Mr MK had refused to acknowledge the terms set out in Mr FH’s letter and had declined to continue to act for him unless Mr PB provided security for the fir...

3. You have been charged with a category 2 or 3 offence and a High Court has made an order that you be tried in the High Court

   ...questions. You can cross-examine on any matter that is relevant to the trial. If the prosecution wishes to clarify anything that came up during your cross-examination of their witness, they may re-examine that witness. (10) End of Crown evidence You may address the court at the end of the Crown prosecutor’s case. If you believe that the Crown evidence is insufficient to prove that you committed the offence(s), you may submit that there is no case to answer at this stage of the trial. If the j...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Going to court without a lawyer >
   4. Representing yourself in a criminal case in the High Court >
   5. How you can represent yourself in a criminal proceeding

4. 2017 NZSSAA 019 (1 May 2017) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...writing subsequent to the hearing. [28] In these circumstances, the Authority must conclude that there is a specific legislative mandate requiring that the calculation is to be on a weekly basis. [29] There remains the discretion in s 64(2B), it addresses the need to consider how to apply income, notwithstanding that the calculations are weekly. In some cases, income is received for periods of work that will not accord with the weekly calculation. Say, for example, if a person i...

5. [2016] NZEmpC 136 Xtreme Dining Ltd t/a Think Steel v Dewar [pdf, 391 KB]

   ...incident of theft of petrol by use of a company fuel card, and may have been involved in 27 other similar incidents. [4] The event which triggered the dismissal occurred after Mr Dewar had driven his car at the request of a work colleague, to a Z Service Station at Belfast in Christchurch. The colleague, Mr Chris Feaver, and a friend who did not work for Think Steel, Mr Shane Jones, wanted cash so as to purchase beer. At the service station, Mr Feaver used Think Steel’s fuel ca...

6. [2021] NZEmpC 214 McDonnell v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...the Chief Executive. Subsequently, that position was disestablished and replaced with the position of General Manager. [12] The job description for Board Administrator was to provide an effective and efficient secretarial and administrative service for the Board of Trustees and its committees. There was an expectation that the Chairperson would be assisted in 7 Humphrey, above n 6, at [7]. 8 NZ Tax Refunds Ltd, above n 5, at [12]. 9 Brooks Homes Ltd v NZ Tax Refunds Ltd [...

7. LCRO 21-2017 AJ v AK [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...at [5]–[17]. 5 Hong v Auckland Standards Committee No 3 [2014] NZHC 2871. 4 [20] Mr AJ continues to hold the remaining trust account funds, which now amount to approximately $22,000. Complaint [21] Mr AK lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Lawyers Complaints Service (Complaints Service) on or about 27 January 2016. The substance of Mr AK’s complaint was that Mr AJ: (a) had agreed to seek clarifying orders from the Judge about the correct division of...

8. Bratton v Le Lievre - Muriwhenua Incorporation [2017] Māori Appellate Court MB 351 (2017 APPEAL 351) [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...Introduction [1] This appeal was dismissed on 8 June 2017. Counsel were invited to exchange submissions on costs and these were filed on 8 August and 6 September 2017 respectively.1 [2] The appellant is legally aided.2 Pursuant to s 45(2) of the Legal Services Act 2011, costs cannot be awarded against the appellant unless there are ‘exceptional circumstances’. [3] The issue for determination is whether a costs award is appropriate. Respondent’s submissions [4] The responde...

9. Beauchamp v B & T Co (2011) Ltd (Costs) [2022] NZHRRT 30 [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...defendants. [4] While the costs application was served on the first defendant on 14 May 2022, Ms Beauchamp was unsuccessful in locating the second defendant, Ms Bing Du. Consequently, the Tribunal on 16 June 2022 made an order for substituted service. By affidavit sworn on 26 July 2022 and by memorandum of the same date, the Director has satisfied the Tribunal that the order for substituted service has been complied with and that Ms Du is to be treated as having been served with the...

10. Director of Proceedings v Chief Executive, Department of Corrections [2021] NZHRRT 34 [pdf, 567 KB]

    ...defendant and who were on site from 7am until 10pm daily. Outside of these times, a nurse was available 3 on call. In addition, the defendant contracted doctors to provide GP services for 16 hours each week, spread over four days. 8. All new arrivals at the Corrections Facility were required to undergo an initial health assessment (“IHA”). Following the IHA, prisoners could request access to non- urgent health services verbally or by submitting a Health Request Form (...