Search Results

Search results for new address for service .

8021 items matching your search terms

Search Disputes Tribunal only.

  1. Waikato and Waipā River Iwi.pdf [pdf, 240 KB]

    ...https://www.environmentcourt.govt.nz/cases-online/waikato-regional-council-plan-change-1/env-2020-akl-7/#ENV-2020-AKL-000094%20Royal%20Forest%20and%20Bird%20Protection%20Society%20of%20New%20Zealand%20Incorporated%20v%20Waikato%20Regional%20Council 4 the Waikato and Waipā Rivers, which are acknowledged by the Crown and in legislation. (b) To address the long-held grievances of those Iwi regarding the continued degradation of the Waikato and Waipā Rivers, the Crown and the Iwi ag...

  2. [2021] NZEmpC 138 The 20 District Health Boards v New Zealand Nurses Organisation [pdf, 378 KB]

    THE 20 DISTRICT HEALTH BOARDS (listed in Appendix A) v NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION [2021] NZEmpC 138 [23 August 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZEmpC 138 EMPC 266/2021 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed in full from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN THE 20 DISTRICT HEALTH BOARDS (listed in Appendix A) Plaintiffs AND NEW ZEALAND NUR...

  3. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - discussion document - Easy Read [docx, 9.6 MB]

    ...contact us by email at: humanrights@justice.govt.nz · [image: Text Description automatically generated]This information has been written by the Ministry of Justice. [image: Easy Read logo.] It has been translated into Easy Read by the Make It Easy service of People First New Zealand Inc. Ngā Tāngata Tuatahi. [image: People First logo.] The ideas in this document are not the ideas of People First New Zealand Inc. Ngā Tāngata Tuatahi. [image: Change logo. Change is the name of the o...

  4. HJ v IK LCRO 127/2015 (19 February 2016) [pdf, 128 KB]

    ...Legal Complaints Review Officer In accordance with s 213 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 copies of this decision are to be provided to: [Company A] and Mr HJ as the Applicants Ms IK as the Respondent The Standards Committee The New Zealand Law Society

  5. [2018] NZEmpC 51 Kocatürk v Zara’s Turkish Ltd [pdf, 349 KB]

    ...overview of it but did not mention the 28-day time limit to challenge the determination as of right. Mr and Mrs Kocatürk said that while they were pleased with the determination there were aspects of it they disagreed with. Steps were not taken to address what they disagreed with, however, because they believed there was no alternative other than to accept the outcome. They said they did not understand the process and waited for Zara’s Turkish to pay the money awarded to them....

  6. [2022] NZEmpC 30 Cousens v Star Nelson Holdings Ltd [pdf, 210 KB]

    ...The fine [28] The maximum fine is $40,000. [29] In Cooper v Phoenix Publishing Ltd I reviewed recent cases that had been decided up to that point in time and concluded they illustrated that where an employer in breach had taken no steps to address that breach, and there were no issues about capacity to pay, or history of previous breaches, the starting point for the assessment of an appropriate fine was approximately $10,000.8 The fine in that case was set at $12,000. In some...

  7. BE v D Ltd & DO Ltd [2024] NZDT 230 (25 March 2024) [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...this matter, the Tribunal has had the opportunity to review documents including: a. submissions and (where appropriate) photographs put forward by each of the parties; b. DO Ltd information booklet [booklet title], and booking information; c. New Zealand Telecommunications Forum (“TCF”) Code for Installation of Fibre Telecommunications Services (v.1.0); d. DO Ltd (confidential) [redacted] e. TCF booklets “[booklet title]”, for homeowners, and for cable installers; f....

  8. [2018] NZEmpC 79 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd [pdf, 513 KB]

    ...which EPL operates. Since that incident the Port operators, including EPL, have been focussed on ensuring nothing like that happens again. The maritime context generally [12] The Maritime Transport Act 1994 applies generally to ships navigating New Zealand waters. Section 60A(1) requires the master of a ship to ensure that a pilot is taken on board the ship in accordance with and whenever required by maritime rules. A “pilot” of a ship is any person, not being the master or...

  9. Crimes (Countering Foreign Interference) Amendment Bill [pdf, 309 KB]

    8194892 Level 2 Justice Centre, 19 Aitken Street, Wellington 6011 | PO Box 2858 or DX SP20208, Wellington 6140, New Zealand | +64 4 472 1719 | crownlaw.govt.nz 14 October 2024 Attorney-General Crimes (Countering Foreign Interference) Amendment Bill [PCO 26216/4.0] – Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 Our Ref: ATT395/419 1. We have considered the Crimes (Countering Foreign Interference) Amendment Bill (Bill) for consistency with the New Zealand B...

  10. Tahata v Tahata - Proprietors of Ngāwhakatutu A1A (2015) 49 Tairawhiti MB 251 (49 TRW 251) [pdf, 214 KB]

    49 Tairawhiti MB 251 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRCT A20140007684 UNDER Section 269(4), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Proprietors of Ngāwhakatutu A1A & Other Blocks Incorporation BETWEEN BEN MORRIS TAHATA Applicant AND FLEUR LEE TAHATA AND MORRIS MEHA Respondents Hearing: 21 November 2014, 44 Tairawhiti MB 143-171 (Heard at Gisborne) Appearances: Terena Wara for...