8021 items matching your search terms
...alternative dispute resolution of the proceedings. __________________________ N J Garvan / H G Watson Counsel for Genesis Energy Limited Dated 21 September 2020 26569171_2 Form 33 Notice of wish to be party to proceedings 3 Address for service: Genesis Energy Limited C/- Bell Gully Level 22, Vero Centre, 48 Shortland Street PO Box 1149 Auckland 1140 Attention: Natasha Garvan / Hannah Watson Telephone: (09) 916 8800 Facsimile: (09) 916 8801 Emai...
THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that there is to be a sitting of the Environment Court as detailed below to hear the proceedings listed in the attached schedule. The details for these proceedings are as follows COMMENCING: TIME: VENUE: Time Allocated: 1. PROCEDURES Wednesday, 4 December 2019 10:00 AM Courtroom 13, Environment Court 20 Lichfield Street City Centre Christchurch 3 days At the start of the hearing, the Court will cons...
EC4180_NoticeOfHearing THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that there is to be a sitting of the Environment Court as detailed below to hear the proceedings listed in the attached schedule. The details for these proceedings are as follows COMMENCING: Monday, 26 November 2018 TIME: 10:00 AM VENUE: Hearing Room 2.01, Environment Court Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre Level 2, 41 Federal Street (Corner of Wyndham and Feder...
...2021, recorded as the “Ninth JWS dated 4 and 21 June 2021 – Objective, Stranded Assets, and Miscellaneous Minor Matters” (‘the Ninth JWS’). 6. This supplementary evidence is intended to inform the Court of my opinion on the matters addressed in the Ninth JWS. Objective/s to replace Objective 10A.1.1 7. I support the revised Objective 10A.1.1 set out in Paragraph 5 of the Ninth JWS, for the reasons outlined in the JWS. 8. I prefer Version B of the proposed second and th...
...on the rights and liabilities of the parties; (e) subsequent events; and (f) the merits of the proposed challenge (although this factor is subject to the observations in Almond v Read).10 [9] Mr AlKazaz’s application for an extension of time addressed each of the factors in [8](a)–(f). The applicant gave as his reasons for the omission to file a challenge within time that he: (a) relied on a public statement attributed to Enterprise IT, that it intended to file a challenge...
...judicially reviewed the 2012 rating decision as to alleged procedural missteps by the LVT during the hearing, and has also appealed its substantive 2012 rating decision (the challenges).2 Complaint [19] On 1 September 2020, Mr FK complained to the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (Complaints Service) about Mr TZ’s cross-examination of the COMPANY A valuers, Ms EU and himself during the 2012 rates hearing. [20] The nub of Mr FK’s complaint was that during Mr TZ’s cr...
...Decision No: [2025] NZIACDT 14 Reference No: IACDT 016/24 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN IMMIGRATION NEW ZEALAND (Sarah Watson) Complainant AND TZU-TONG JANE MA Adviser Decision on the papers SUBJECT TO SUPPRESSION ORDER DECISION Dated 19 February 2025 REPRESENTATION: Registra...
...co-authored a report18 which described the assumptions and findings which had been made in the preparation of SCGM 2022. The report included district-level growth projections for the long term period from 2022-2052 sourced from the 2022 Statistics New Zealand population projections which had then been converted into household and dwelling projections for the district.19 [29] Ms Hampson advised that SCGM 2022 included a capacity assessment which took into account the Selwyn District...
LCRO 106/2018 LCRO 107/2018 LCRO 170/2018 LCRO 181/2018 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN SY, [SAL] and DT Applicants AND [AREA] STANDARDS COMMITTEE [X] Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Ms SY, Mr DT and
...your refusal to return documents and funds is in breach of rule 4.4 of the CCCR. [8] It was this final comment that prompted the filing of complaint by Mr JT. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [9] Mr JT lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (NZLS) on 6 June 2013. The substance of his complaint was that: (a) He had provided explanation to Mr SC as to why he was unable to release files and funds immediately. (a) Mr SC had threatened...