Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 167 MTP Limited v Westland District Council [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...for rural- residential purposes at Haast-Jackson Bay Road, Okuru. [2] While the subdivision consent has been given effect to, to date only one house has been built. The District Council contends that the land use consent has lapsed and that a new resource consent is required before any more houses can be built. [3] This proceeding concerns an application by MTP Ltd for a declaration that land use consent 140062 has been given effect to and has not lapsed under s 125 of the Reso...

2. LCRO 73/2024 OR v SV (3 September 2024) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...against 3 the Suburb 1 property and that this would involve an application and an assessment of her income. [15] At some point during this period, draft wills were prepared for Mr AE and the applicant. The first draft wills had an incorrect address for the Suburb 2 property. [16] On 31 January 2020, Mr AE instructed the respondent that: Bank X are making it too hard for the Suburb 1 property. I think we stick with the title on Suburb 2. The other property will be sold if anythi...

3. Regulatory Impact Statement – Addendum: Including 17 year-olds, and non-imprisonable traffic offences that can result in a conviction, in the youth justice system [pdf, 577 KB]

   ...and non-imprisonable traffic offence that can result in a conviction, in the youth justice system. This addendum should be read in conjunction with that RIS. In particular, the paper compares the likely outcomes, costs, benefits and risks of new proposals against the likely outcomes, costs, benefits and risks of the proposal to include all 17 year olds in the YJ system. Proposals in this paper are not being compared against a decision to keep the affected 17 year-olds in the adult...

4. NB v CF & MF [2024] NZDT 515 (13 August 2024) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...They agreed to reduce the purchase price to $365,000 in light of ‘the work in the building report and … for the septic tank to be cleaned and a certificate provided showing that prior to settlement’. 7. CF and MF said they engaged M from I Services to clean the septic tank. M said there was no certificate that he knew of that he could provide, so instead he confirmed in an email: “To whom it may concern, We visited [address] twice in the week of 26th - 30th October. The fi...

5. ENVC Matiatia transcript notice of motion 20150326 [pdf, 478 KB]

   ...talks about now a need for public drop off car parks to be used where previously there was none. The necessity that the park two public spaces may be used where before there was none. Now of course WML accepts that all of these things need to be addressed and it's put forward this woolly management plan condition that’s supposedly going to fix all of this and 25 stop people parking in the closet available carpark. THE COURT: JUDGE NEWHOOK Or in the alternative an appli...

6. LCRO 104/2016 and LCRO 192/2016 LP v PR (27 June 2019) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...argument is premised on the view that it was too late for Mr LP to deny he had authorised Mr PR and Mrs YL to act by the time they took steps to recover Mrs YL’s fees. As far as Mr PR was concerned, Mrs YL’s fee notes were properly rendered for services she had provided to the Trust. Mr PR’s lawyers say that even though Mrs YL was no longer available to give evidence, it was acknowledged by the Court that arguments were available on both sides and that the parties may simply...

7. LCRO 58/2018 QD v FZ (12 October 2018) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...dismiss you as my lawyer for the case CRI-XXX-XXX-XXXXXX 2 I have informed [Town] District Court today at 12.30pm and have a meeting tomorrow with Legal Aid … [3] Mr QD did not attend Court on 8 February 2017, understanding that the Legal Services Agency (LSA) would appoint another lawyer and his services were not required. [4] It seems no new lawyer was appointed. Mr QD then received an email from the lawyer who had appeared for the Crown conveying the Court’s direction t...

8. Human v New Zealand Law Society [2014] NZLCDT 32 [pdf, 174 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZLCDT 32 LCDT 027/13 IN THE MATTER of an Appeal under Section 42 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN HIEROPHANTIC HARLEQUINESQUE HUMAN Appellant AND NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr M Gough Mr G McKenzie Ms M Scholtens QC Mr W Smith HEARING at the Employment Court at Auckland DATE OF...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 102 Tinkler v Fugro PMS Pty Ltd & Pavement Management Service [pdf, 100 KB]

   BRYCE TINKLER V FUGRO PMS PTY LTD & PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 102 [3 July 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 102 ARC 98/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination by the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BRYCE TINKLER Plaintiff AND FUGRO PMS PTY LTD & PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD Defendant ARC 30/12 AND IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed BETWEEN FUGRO PMS

10. [2018] NZLCDT 4 Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Ellis [pdf, 398 KB]

    ...in the past but not, I did not rush out and get a copy of the Rules when I wrote that letter.”27 [68] Had he done so, he would have seen that a bare disclosure as to a possible conflict and suggestion of independent advice was not sufficient to address it. Rather he would have seen that, having a personal interest in the matter in which he was acting, he was absolutely disqualified from continuing to act. [69] We consider that it is reckless not to pay more attention to the Rules...