Search Results

1. J v A LCRO 31/2009 (30 April 2009) [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...accountant brought the accounts to the notice of Client J in a timely way. This may not have been Lawyer A’s usual way of delivering bills, however it is clear that they were adequately brought to the notice of Client J. No particular method of service or delivery of a bill of costs is required. [14] This review concerns two bills of costs which were rendered prior to 1 August 2008.The complaint was made on 4 September 2008. Complaints made subsequent to 1 August 2008 (when t...

2. [2008] NZEmpC AC 4/08 NZ Airline Pilots Association Inc v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 54 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INC V AIR NEW ZEALAND LTD AK AC 4/08 19 March 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 4/08 ARC 64/04 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF a referral back from the Supreme Court BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INC Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 13 March 2008 (Heard at Auckland) Court: Judge B S Travi...

3. [2020] NZIACDT 23 - Y(O)R v Tian (8 June 2020) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...director of Abstract Solution Limited, of Auckland. She has been licensed since May 2009. [5] The complainant, a national of China, first travelled to New Zealand in 2012. The records of Immigration New Zealand show that she had used Ms Tian’s services from about February 2014. Entrepreneur visa application [6] On 30 September 2014, Ms Tian lodged an entrepreneur work visa application for the complainant, including her husband and their dependent son. An adult son was not m...

4. Trustees of Te Waiti 2C2 v Allison - Te Waiti No2C No2 (2014) 107 Waiariki MB 115 (107 WAR 115) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...Block was the intended land of the wrongly placed structure, such requirement in s 24 is therefore met. [15] Counsel also distinguished the Coles v Miller decision from the decision in Attorney General v Māori Land Court 12 as the latter case addressed the issue of restricted equitable jurisdiction of the Court in relation to fiduciary duties. Further, the Court of 11 Gardiner v Gorringe (2008) 93 Tauranga MB 63 (93 T 63). 12...

5. Investment brief: Correctional alcohol & drug treatment [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...shown to be effective, particularly services such as the Drug Treatment Units (DTUs) that apply the Therapeutic Communities model.  Rehabilitation programmes are most effective when targeted at people at high risk of reoffending.  For New Zealand-based programmes in prison, one person is prevented from being re-imprisoned for every 20 prisoners receiving the programme.  Treatment for adolescent offenders can reduce substance use, but it does not tend to reduce...

6. Body Corporate 199883 & Ors (Ridgeview Apartments) v Clarke [2010] NZWHT Auckland 22 [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...butynol type membrane; and to install glass blocks without a frame and flashings. Mr Clarke’s principal concern was time and cost. Page | 8 [22] Throughout 1999 and 2000 Chelsea Developments Limited issued invoices for construction services and materials to the “Clarke Family Trust” c/o Mr Peter Clarke’s personal address. Each of these invoices were paid by CFA. [23] Most of the apartments were sold off the plan – i.e. prior to completion of construc...

7. Pilon v Iyengar and C&CDHB [2012] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...re-litigate a matter which has already been determined against Mr Pilon and on the grounds that the proceedings amount to an abuse of process. [2] By memorandum dated 5 July 2011 Mr McClelland advised that Dr Iyengar no longer resides or practises in New Zealand. She has not been served with this proceeding. The position adopted by counsel on behalf of Dr Iyengar is that while supporting the second defendant’s application, counsel does not wish to take any further part in this appli...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 042 The Architectural Centre v Wellington City Council [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...13~ • Views 13~ • Circulation and Connections 1~13 • Elevational Modelling +J14 • Ol2en Sl2ace and Landscal2e on 320 The Terrace 14 6.0 Analysis: Peripheral Sites 154 • Area 4: Landcross Street 154 • Area 5: Weir House/Trinity Newman/Clermont Terrace 16.§. 7.0 Objectives: Peripheral Sites 18H • Massing 18H • Scale 18H • Views 18H • Circulation 18H • Elevational Modelling 18H 8.0 Guidelines: Peripheral Sites 19M • Massing 19M • Scale 20W...

9. LCRO 132/2018 PY v SD (15 February 2019) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...shocked and disturbed by his claims”.4 The Standards Committee determination [11] The Committee considered whether Mr SD had breached r 12 of the Rules. It said:5 … whilst Mr SD could have chosen his words more carefully, Mr SD’s letter is addressed to the LCRO and not to Mrs PY directly and, while expressing a different view of events from that held by Mrs PY, is an illustration of how Mrs PY’s concerns about her mother were understood by Mr SD’s staff when the allegatio...

10. Workington v Sheffield LCRO 55 / 2009 (26 August 2009) [pdf, 148 KB]

    ...to pay their fees would result in the debt being referred to Baycorp. The evidence shows that the matter was registered with Baycorp on 29 October 2008. [9] In December 2008 Mr and Mrs Workington filed a complaint against the lawyers with the New Zealand Law Society raising a number of complaints in relation to the legal services that had been provided, which they considered justified the refusal to pay the balance of any fees claimed by the firm. The complaints [10] The compla...