Search Results

Search results for new address for service .

8021 items matching your search terms

Search Disputes Tribunal only.

  1. Protected person TPO Information Pack [pdf, 560 KB]

    ...Eastern women and their children. • It’s Not OK: 0800 456 450 (9am-11pm) or areyouok.org.nz For more (local) organisations visit: • familyservices.govt.nz/directory/ • nnsvs.org.nz/information/ If you need legal advice The New Zealand Law Society has a directory of where public Lawyers are around New Zealand. Visit: familylaw.org.nz/public/find-a-lawyer If you cannot afford a lawyer you might be able to get Legal aid. This is where the government will pay fo...

  2. [2019] NZEnvC 039 New Zealand Association of Radio Transmitters Incorporated v Kapiti Coast District Council [pdf, 611 KB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court : Hearing: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 3 i of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act NEW ZEALAND ASSOCIATION OF RADIO TRANSMITTERS INCORPORATED and KAPITI AMATEUR RADIO SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-20 18-WLG-000006) Appellants KAPITI COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge B P Dwyer Environment Commissioner D J Bunting...

  3. [2025] NZEmpC 174  Bowen v National Australia Bank Ltd [pdf, 164 KB]

    BOWEN v NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED [2025] NZEmpC 174 [14 August 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 174 EMPC 474/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF applications for costs BETWEEN MELISSA JANE BOWEN Plaintiff AND NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED First Defendant...

  4. LCRO 3/2017 and LCRO 148/2017 McDonnell v LA (28 June 2019) [pdf, 436 KB]

    ...for the rest home care subsidy, was $218,423, together with a pre-paid funeral account of $10,000 and an ability to gift $30,000 over a five-year period. I accept that this was accurate. 4 Complaint [25] Ms LA lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (the Complaints Service) on 12 May 2016. The substance of her complaint was that: (a) the first asset schedule produced by Ms McDonnell was incorrect. It took 15 months to rectify and caused profo...

  5. [2019] NZEnvC 112 Golf 2012 Limited v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 24 MB]

    ...Matarangi Golf Course. b) In relation to the Matarangi Structure Plan generally, the decision was as follows: Matarangi Structure Plan 5.36 This structure plan was subject to a substantial number of submissions and further submissions. The Panel has addressed Holes 1 and 2 of the Matarangi Golf Course separately in Decision Report 24. In terms of the Matarangi Structure Plan, this is a refinement and roll-over of the existing structure plan in the ODP. It has a long history which was...

  6. O'Hagan v Police [2020] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 827 KB]

    ...(PA). [3] As the statutory consequence of a failure to comply with the 20 working day timeframe results in a deemed refusal of the IPP 6 request, the question for the Tribunal is what, if any consequences, ought to flow from that fact. [4] Before addressing the issues raised by the parties it is necessary to deal with the question of delay. Delay [5] Mr O’Hagan has rightly expressed concern at the delay in the delivery of this decision. That delay is acknowledged. The reasons we...

  7. [2018] NZEnvC 097 Handley v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 5.2 MB]

    ...sharp right through the middle of a certified organic farm owned by the appellant, Ms HANDLEY v STDC - PRELIMINARY FINDINGS 2 Handley. The Project would see this section (referred to as the 'dog-leg') straightened such that the new alignment would run more or less adjacent to the eastern boundary of the farm to a new intersection with SH3 (although requiring some land of the appellant's to be taken along that boundary and in the vicinity of the new intersection)....

  8. [2023] NZEmpC 195 PIC Insurance Brokers Ltd v Pepper [pdf, 293 KB]

    ...be entitled to bring claims against Ms Pepper, Mr Cooper and Oceania, but not Ms Pierce or, at this stage, any other unidentified third party. Is it impossible or impracticable to formulate a claim against the intended defendants? [27] When addressing the second limb of the test, the Court of Appeal stated in Exchange Commerce Corp Ltd v New Zealand News Ltd:8 Then there are the words “impossible or impracticable”. There is some, but not much, difference between these words i...

  9. [2024] NZEmpC 99 Putaanga v MOVe Freight Ltd [pdf, 243 KB]

    ...which was similar to what happened to Mr Putaanga. It was common ground that on that earlier occasion, he, along with others, had raised concerns, which Ms Valdes said had been escalated. She was hopeful that the issue with the rail had been addressed at that time, but unfortunately that was not the case. [41] In answer to questions from Mr Putaanga, Ms Valdes accepted that he had complained at their meeting about the loading rail not working and how frustrated he was that this...

  10. Arnold v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2024] NZACC 157 (2 October 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...the Corporation to assess the value to an employee of the provision of a “company car”. Evidence could be given as to the extent to which the employee used the car for private purposes, the cost of running vehicles of all kinds is regularly addressed by motoring organisations; there are recognised scales for assessing costs per kilometre such as the public service scale. The evidence indicated that personnel or management consultants are used to putting a figure on the value o...