Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 023 Royal Forest Bird Protection Society of NZ Inc v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...part heard before the Environment Court. Other councils, such as Auckland, appear to be taking alternative approaches. We commend the Northland Regional Council for utilising the Biosecurity Act, which does seem to have particular provisions for addressing the issues arising in this case. It also fits within the broader concept of the Biosecurity Act in relation to other biological pest threats to New Zealand flora and fauna. There is no disagreement between the parties that this Pl...

2. LCRO 94/2024 NS v WB (26 February 2025) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...Mr WB said this: I have received a telephone message from NS stating that he wished to call at my office to have a look at the company documents that you delivered to me in two sealed boxes for me to store temporarily pending the appointment of a new Company accountant. As you know I agreed to store the boxes at no charge on the basis that they would be delivered to me in sealed boxes which would then be uplifted for delivery to the new Company accountant a short time later. If I was...

3. Immigration & Protection Tribunal Annual Report 2018-2019 [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...result was that, in all streams of work, the Tribunal’s work was “in flow”: that is, almost all appeals could be allocated or set down for hearing as soon as they were received and made ready to be decided. 3. Through further training and new work allocation across streams of work, members were provided with greater diversity in their work, thus allowing for more flexibility in their deployment to respond to the changing needs of the Tribunal. The Tribunal now more accur...

4. [2013] NZEmpC 85 Aarts v Barnados New Zealand [pdf, 328 KB]

   JOHAN AARTS V BARNARDOS NEW ZEALAND NZEmpC AK [2013] NZEmpC 85 [20 May 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 85 ARC 14/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JOHAN AARTS Plaintiff AND BARNARDOS NEW ZEALAND First Defendant AND COMMISSIONER OF NEW ZEALAND POLICE Second Defendant AND MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Third Defendant AND THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER Fourt...

5. Robinson - Te Tii A Waitangi Marae (2023) 261 Taitokerau MB 220 (261 TTK 220) [pdf, 367 KB]

   261 Taitokerau MB 220 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAITOKERAU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Taitokerau District A20200003143 WĀHANGA Under Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Te Tii A Waitangi Marae NĀ By MOEMAI ROBINSON Te kaitono Applicant A20200014730 WĀHANGA Under Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Te Tii Waitangi A NĀ...

6. Wilton TRI-2021-100-002 [2023] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 [pdf, 629 KB]

   ...TRUST Claimants AND DEANE FLUIT BUILDER LTD First Respondent AND TAB DESIGN LTD (Removed) Second Respondent AND TILING SOLUTIONS WANAKA LTD Third Respondent AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Fourth Respondent AND HEMPEL (WATTYL) NEW ZEALAND LTD formally called VALSPAR PAINT (NZ) Ltd Fifth Respondent AND WILTON JOUBERT LTD Sixth Respondent Hearing: 22–26 May 2023 Closing submissions: Claimants 21 June 2023 Fourth respondent’s cross claim closings 28 June...

7. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Netsafe Inc [2022] NZHRRT 15 (Removal of Certain Redactions After Appeal Period) [pdf, 511 KB]

   1 (1) PERMANENT ORDERS PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS AND IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE AGGRIEVED INDIVIDUALS AND EVIDENCE GIVEN BY MR COCKER AT PARAGRAPH 7 OF HIS WITNESS STATEMENT DATED 18 JUNE 2019 (2) PERMANENT ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 15 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA Reference No. HRRT 040/2018 UNDER...

8. [2016] NZEmpC 177 Go Bus Transport Ltd v Hellyer [pdf, 421 KB]

   ...influenced the decision to dismiss and whether he was dismissed in part for a reason directly or indirectly because of his involvement in the activities of a union. [8] The Authority concluded that Mr Hellyer’s role as Branch President of the New Zealand Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Employees Union (the Union) and negotiator in collective bargaining fell within the definition of “involvement in the activities of a union for the purpose of s 104” as defined in s 107...

9. Cooper v Wellington City Council [pdf, 237 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 2171 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN AVIS COOPER Claimant AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND R & I KENNEDY LIMITED Second Respondent AND R TE ONE ASSOCIATES LIMITED Third Respondent AND No Fourth Respondent Master Build Services Limited having been struck out AND TREVOR GASKIN Fifth Respondent AND No Sixth Respondent CSR Building

10. [2017] NZEmpC 12 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...terms of how to dispose of the case, and for the defendant, in terms of how to respond, if at all, to a positive defence, and how to deal with the absence of a reply. Procedural lacunas are, of course, the very thing that reg 6(2) is directed at addressing. High Court Rules 5.62 and 5.63 fill the void left by the Regulations. Rule 171 would have previously done so, 10 at the time the Regulations were made. [19] I agree with Mr Sharp’s submission that reading the Regulations...