Search Results

1. [2018] NZLCDT 1 Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Hay [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...from the IDHT account and paid to Nelson Rock. That is a company, the sole director of which is Adrian Skinner, Barrie Skinner’s brother. Mr A Skinner has sworn an affidavit in which he provides an explanation for this payment, in relation to services provided by him to Mr Hay. We will refer to the Tribunal’s view of that evidence at a later stage. [32] Although $52,500 was paid as a deposit on two sections in Queenstown, this was later forfeited when the purchase did not pr...

2. Kim & Anor v Auckland Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 28 [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...Shuet Mui Foo, as vendor, and Tyae Gyeong Yun as purchaser, in January or February 2001, well before the CCC issued on 26 February 2002. [25] Mr Yau was an auditor for a bank in Hong Kong before he and his wife, Shuet Mui Foo, emigrated to New Zealand in 1989. He has now retired, but from 1990 until 2011, Mr Yau worked for Ponsonby Real Estate, Howick, as a real estate agent. The Council produced evidence of what it says is a history of Mr Yau real estate agent, buying secti...

3. [2014] NZEmpC 30 Austin v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...“transferred” to ACC earnings related compensation payments which were necessarily tied to the 4 January 2009 non-work related incident. [16] On 8 May 2009 at a further meeting with Mr O’Carroll, Mr Austin was prevailed upon to sign a letter addressed to SFFL on its letterhead and pre-prepared by the company, agreeing to discontinue his claim on its scheme and to make a claim on ACC’s scheme in respect of the 4 January 2009 event. [17] Unsurprisingly, ACC then investigated...

4. You have been charged with a category 4 offence

   ...questions. You can cross-examine on any matter that is relevant to the trial. If the prosecution wishes to clarify anything that came up during your cross-examination of their witness, they may re-examine that witness. (10) End of Crown evidence You may address the court at the end of the Crown prosecutor’s case. If you believe that the Crown evidence is insufficient to prove that you committed the offence(s), you may submit that there is no case to answer at this stage of the trial. If the j...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Going to court without a lawyer >
   4. Representing yourself in a criminal case in the High Court >
   5. How you can represent yourself in a criminal proceeding

5. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Latton [2017] NZLCDT 14 [pdf, 61 KB]

   ...whole. You can count yourself fortunate that this Tribunal did not impose a longer period of suspension on you. It has taken into account to a limited extent your underlying psychological condition, but more relevantly that you have taken steps to address that with intensive therapy sessions over an extended period of time. You are on notice that you cannot escape a more serious penalty should conduct of this kind be repeated. DATED at AUCKLAND this 8th day of June 2017...

6. Federated-Farmers-of-New-Zealand.pdf [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...September 2020 169 London Street PO Box 447 Hamilton Telephone: 07 858 0815 Email: ljeffries@fedfarm.org.nz Solicitor acting: Nikki Edwards / Laura Jeffries To: The Registrar Environment Court Auckland Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc (“Federated Farmers”) wishes to be a party to the following proceedings: Pukekohe Vegetable Growers Association v Waikato Regional Council ENV-2020-AKL-000148 Federated Farmers made a submission about the subject m...

7. LCRO 046/2018 HD v BK (18 February 2019) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...circumstances and intentions to be. There were unanswered questions about the status of some property interests. However, Mr HD understood there was no conflict between him and Ms M over their various property interests, they both wanted to create a new agreement (the draft agreement) to replace the 2001 agreement, and wills which reflected their intention to provide for one another’s futures by giving mutual life interests in the home they shared. [5] In early September 2013,...

8. [2022] NZEnvC 074 Malaghans Investments Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 704 KB]

   ...sub-topic 1 (text) to sub-topic 2 (rezoning): Appealed provision Allocated to Rules 46.4.7.2 and 46.4.12.2 relating to the construction or exterior alteration of buildings in the Gibbston Rural Visitor Zone. GVSL’s sub-topic 2 appeal. New Policy 46.2.2.9 relating to roading and infrastructure of a rural standard, character and appearance and related new discretionary Rule 46.5.14. GVSL and Malaghans’ sub-topic 2 appeal. New Policy 46.2.2.10, relating to enabling d...

9. [2019] NZEnvC 143 Granger v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...[sub-clauses 1-8 omitted] (c) should the applicant elect not to pursue the course at (b) above it is to file and serve advice of this by Friday 8 February 2019. The court will then proceed to issue a final decision; (d) should the applicant decide to address the matters raised in this decision, further directions will be made. At this stage, it is our tentative view that the hearing will need to be reconvened. [6] On 8 February 2019, counsel for Peninsula Holdings Trust filed a me...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 36 Yan v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [pdf, 280 KB]

    ...progressed. It was agreed that a formal process might need to be implemented. Mr Haycock accordingly wrote to Mr Yan on 4 June 2010 outlining a number of issues, advising that: … if this behaviour continues, I will have no alternative but to address this through a formal process. [10] Matters did not improve from Mr Haycock’s perspective. He advised Mr Yan that he had received two complaints on 8 June 2010 about the quality of Mr Yan’s work not being of the required...