Search Results

1. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee 2 v Carmichael [2017] NZLCDT 28 [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...and Mr Mackenzie for the respondent. After retiring to consider penalty, it returned and imposed the censure and orders that are recorded at the end of this decision. It reserved its reasons for decision which are now recorded. Principles in addressing penalty [10] The starting point for considering penalty is the seriousness of the conduct in question. [11] Both counsel accept that the respondent’s conduct was a serious breach of a solicitor’s duties when account is taken o...

2. Potatoes NZ Incorporated.PDF [PDF, 894 KB]

   Notice of person's wish to be party to proceedings Section 274, Resource Management Act 1991 To the Registrar Environment Court Auckland Potatoes New Zealand Incorporated wish to be a party to the following proceedings: Appeal To The Environment Court In Respect Of Decisions On The Proposed Waikato Regional Plan Change 1: Waikato And Waipā River Catchments: ENV 2020 AKL: 000096: THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION. 1. Potatoes New Zealand (PNZ) is a person who has an in...

3. LCRO 59/2021 RY v QX (21 December 2022) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...again asked (by letter) Mr RY to resign. Six weeks or so later, on 6 July 2018, VF and OZ informed (by letter) Mr RY they intended to engage another accountant for the trust. [7] The following month they complained about Mr RY’s conduct to the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants (NZICA).4 [8] On 20 November 2018, having received OZ’s 5 September 2018 letter in which OZ explained she and VF no longer had a working relationship with Mr RY, Mr QX informed (by lette...

4. [2017] NZEnvC 120 Housing New Zealand Corporation v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Court: Environment Judge C J Thompson Decision No: [2017] NZEnvC 120 of an appeal under the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 HOUSING NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION (ENV-2016-AKL-0000238) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Deputy Environment Commissioner R M Bartlett Hearing: at Auckland 27 and 28 June 2017. Site vi

5. [2020] NZEmpC 149 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v CultureSafe NZ Ltd [pdf, 438 KB]

   BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD v CULTURESAFE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 149 [22 September 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 149 EMPC 49//2019 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed in full from the Employment Relations Authority AND THE MATTER of a preliminary issue BETWEEN BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Plaintiff AND...

6. Court-imposed fines: survey of Judges [pdf, 509 KB]

   Court-imposed fines: A survey of Judges Wendy Searle July 2003 ii First published in July 2003 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand www.justice.govt.nz © Crown Copyright ISBN 0-478-20177-x iii Foreword Fines are the most widely imposed penalty in the New Zealand courts. For many minor offences, and in particular traffic offences, a fine is the only available option. In 2001, 33% of all charges resulting in a conviction had a fine imposed as one of the s

7. [2016] NZEmpC 154 AFFCO NZ Ltd v NZMWU [pdf, 197 KB]

   AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED v NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 154 [23 November 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 154 EMPC 178/2016 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for an interim compliance order BETWEEN AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS &...

8. LCRO 20/2019 OT v GA (25 January 2021) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...for a review of the determination by [City] Standards Committee to take no further action on his complaints. Background [2] Mr OT was the principal shareholder of [XYZ (NZ) Limited] [(XYZ)], a specialist [XX] business. The company also had the New Zealand exclusive rights to distribute and maintain [TUV] under licence from [Country]. [3] On 24 December 2014, [XYZ] entered into an agreement with [QRS] International Limited ([QRS]) whereby QRS would purchase the assets (as define...

9. Johnston v Abide Homes Limited [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...from the third respondents, Mr and Mrs Towne (“the Townes”). When the Johnstons began to renovate the downstairs bathroom they discovered that the external wall was rotten. They filed an application with the Weathertight Homes Resolution Service for an eligibility report (“the first report”) and the WHRS assessor detected further damage. The Johnstons repaired their house and claim the cost of these repairs, interest and general damages. THE PARTIES [2]...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 96 Allied Security Ltd v Marriott interlocutory [pdf, 88 KB]

    ...Limited (Allied). He had been engaged as a security guard, and was normally employed in a guardhouse at the goods entrance of a site owned by Progressive Enterprises Limited (Progressive). Mr Marriott had removed from a computer system the contact address of his former manager, Mr Williams, who had also been the site supervisor. Because he had 1 Marriott v Allied Security Ltd [2015 ] NZERA Christchurch 18. difficulty in...