Search Results

1. Hayward v Barnardos NZ Inc (Jurisdiction) [2022] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 22 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 took her claim to the Privacy Commissioner. On 21 April 2021 the Privacy Commissioner responded, inter alia: We have received your complaint about Barnardos Child and Family Services. I understand you asked for your file and you are concerned that information is missing. You also believe there are inaccuracies in the information that was disclosed to you. Barnardos has advised you that it has added your amend...

2. Appendix-20-ATH-2012014503.00-Decision.pdf [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...information provided by the applicant and conditions of the resource consent, the conditions of the resource consent apply. Advice Note: Any change from the location, design concepts and parameters, implementation and/or operation may require a new resource consent or a change of consent conditions pursuant to section 127 of the Resource Management Act 1991. 3. The total combined volume of water abstracted from both bores for stock water, dairyshed wash down and domestic supply pu...

3. Auckland Standards Committee v Potter [2014] NZLCDT 63 [pdf, 62 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZLCDT 63 LCDT 036/13 UNDER the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of disciplinary proceedings under Part 7 of the Act BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 4 Applicant AND STEPHEN POTTER Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr C Lucas Ms C Rowe Mr W Smith Mr I Williams HEARING at Auckland DATE OF HEARING 14 Augus...

4. [2021] NZEnvC 070 Seafort Holdings Limited v Far North District Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...357C(4)(b) and this in turn means that the Court cannot proceed to deal with the appeal because it has no decision on the objection. [21] I note the Court was anxious that this matter be dealt with possible, by mediation. This issue would have been addressed in particular if such mediation had occurred. Council's refusal to do has led to the current situation. [22] I note that Mr Adams in his submissions dated 23 April 2021 and filed after those for the Council including the af...

5. LCRO 52/2017 BL v JC (30 November 2018) [pdf, 332 KB]

   LCRO 52/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN BL Applicant AND JC Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms BL has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] to take no furth

6. Proactive Release-Sentencing Reinstating Three-Strikes Amendment Regulations 2025 [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...N C E 2 I N C O N F I D E N C E The Regulations prescribe forms for the reinstated Three Strikes regime 7 The Regulations, which are based on the 2010 regulations, amend three existing forms in the Sentencing Regulations 2002 and create six new forms for use in proceedings under the Act. 8 Forms are a standard and necessary way for the Court to inform offenders about important matters relating to their sentencing. The Regulations include forms to ensure that offenders are consi...

7. Im-just-content-to-them-ECPAT-research-summary-2025-RGB.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...to someone they trust, the system behind that person may still attribute fault to them, shift the burden of safety onto them, or take harmful steps in response. They learn from each of these interactions: that people will hear them, or not; that services are motivated by genuine interest in their safety and healing, or not; that they are worth protecting, supporting, and seeking justice for, or not. Accordingly, some of the most powerful findings are not about the presence or absence...

8. [2019] NZEnvC 101 Stone v Hastings District Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...development rights to a single dwelling and accessory building on Lot 1 by way of consent notice and restrict Lot 2 to its existing buildings other than replacement, in addition to surrendering the commercial and industrial rights created by the new Lot 1. The issue [9] The primary issues for the Court's determination are: (a) whether the application is contrary to the objectives and pOlicies of the proposed Hastings District Plan as amended by decisions (the PDP); and (b)...

9. Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal - Further Decisions [pdf, 536 KB]

   ...‘class actions’ where one of the parties is a group of people represented collectively by a member of that group.3 There is one earthquake insurance-related class action4 currently before the High Court. Class actions are relatively new in New Zealand. Although they can support judicial efficiency and access to justice (e.g. by allowing costs to be shared), they require a significant amount of time and resource. Further, the nature of insurance contracts means that...

10. Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal: Further Decisions 29 March 2018 [pdf, 553 KB]

    ...‘class actions’ where one of the parties is a group of people represented collectively by a member of that group.3 There is one earthquake insurance-related class action4 currently before the High Court. Class actions are relatively new in New Zealand. Although they can support judicial efficiency and access to justice (e.g. by allowing costs to be shared), they require a significant amount of time and resource. Further, the nature of insurance contracts means that...