Search Results

1. Alves v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claims Process) [2023 NZACC 197] [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...either on purpose or by incompetence, which led to a lot of mental health issues. [25] This Court acknowledges Mr Alves’ submissions in relation to this appeal. The Court also notes that Mr Alves raised an issue of tax liability that was not addressed by the Reviewer, and so this issue is not considered by the Court in this judgment. [26] The Court also refers to the following considerations. [27] First, the decision of the Reviewer concerning Mr Alves’ complaint of 9 Janu...

2. 2024 NZPSPLA 005 pdf [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...[1] Anzac Simi has applied to renew his certificate of approval (COA). He obtained his current COA on 26 July 2018 and has previously held a COA from February 2013 to February 2018. Mr Simi is one of two company officers of A & M Protection Services Limited which holds a company licence. [2] Police oppose Mr Simi’s application to renew his COA on character grounds and because he has historic disqualifying convictions. Police say the following events raise questions about Mr S...

3. IPT 2019-20 Annual Report [pdf, 477 KB]

   ...to reduce slightly the annual average length of time taken to release decisions. Tribunal members and staff continued to work during the lockdown and weekly meetings were held by telephone and electronic means. 4. Through further training and new work allocation across streams of work, more members were provided with greater diversity in their work, thus allowing for more flexibility in responding to the changing needs of the Tribunal. The Tribunal now substantially reflects what...

4. [2006] NZEmpC CC 7/06 NZ Meatworkers Union Inc v Alliance Group Ltd [pdf, 156 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND MEATWORKERS' UNION INC V ALLIANCE GROUP LIMITED CHCH CC 7/06 16 August 2006 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH CC 7/06 CRC 2/05 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND MEATWORKERS' UNION INC Plaintiff AND ALLIANCE GROUP LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 3 and 4 November 2005 Submissions received from the plaintiff on 11 November 2005 Submissions received from the defendant on 21

5. RH v LV LCRO 189 / 2011 (25 September 2012) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...some months in practice as a barrister. [2] The Practitioner had quoted a fee of $3,000 but ended up charging the Complainant $3,900 which he paid. However, his dissatisfaction with the added charge was raised when the Applicant instructed a new lawyer (Mr S) some two years later. Mr S advised the Applicant that a costs complaint was out of time, but he assisted the Applicant to formulate other complaints against the Practitioner (Mr RH) to the New Zealand Law Society. [3] The...

6. [2016] NZEmpC 137 Bennett and Others v Michaels and Others [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...employed. He was aware also that Mr Michaels was diverting money received for completing contracts into Mr Michaels’ personal account. [15] Mr Zainol described similar behaviour. He was employed to work for the fourth defendant. He was lured to New Zealand from Singapore by a promise of employment by Mr Michaels. He described interviews at a coffee bar. He was also employed as an Operations/Training Manager. He was to be paid $50,000 per annum, provided with a mobile phone...

7. [2023] NZREADT 11 - CAC 2103 v Lieven (15 May 2023) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...complainant issued Ms Lieven with a trespass notice, warning her to stay out of the house until they could come to an agreement. He noted that if she wished to show potential buyers through the property, conditions could be discussed through the Tenancy Services’ mediation service or the Tenancy Tribunal (the TT). [20] Ms Lieven responded as follows Then I’ll sue you for each & every loss The purchase price is $8m [21] The complainant sent two further emails to Ms Liev...

8. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 2 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 12 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 2 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

9. Nicholson v Pene - Tauakira No. 2M No.4 (2023) 477 Aotea MB 140 (477 AOT 140) [pdf, 442 KB]

   477 Aotea MB 140 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District AP-20230000022798 A20200007388 AP-20230000022797 A20200006272 WĀHANGA Under Sections 18(1)(a), 18(1)(d) and 24A Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Tauakira No. 2M No. 4 I WAENGA I A Between SUSAN NICHOLSON ON BEHALF OF THE PETAERA AND POTAKA-OSBORNE WHĀNAU Te Kaitono Applic...

10. EE v ZX LCRO 95/2012 (10 February 2014) [pdf, 111 KB]

    ...immediately, that neither the Standards Committee or this Office has any jurisdiction in respect of the amounts charged by [Company A]. It is unfortunate that Mr ZX has not been disabused of this expectation long ago. That is a civil matter to be addressed between him and [Company B] in the appropriate forum which is most definitely not the Lawyers Disciplinary process. [26] Having considered all of these factors I agree with Ms EE’s view that the complaint was largely about fe...