8021 items matching your search terms
4542649_1 9 March 2018 Attorney-General Privacy Bill (PCO 18441 v 20.1) Our Ref: ATT395/279 1. We have reviewed the Privacy Bill (“the Bill”) and concluded it is consistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (“the Bill of Rights Act”). Introduction 2. The Bill repeals and replaces the Privacy Act 1993 (“the current Act”). Many of the provisions of the current Act are retained. New provisions respond to the Law Commission’s review of the...
...Quigg Partners. [8] In response counsel for the plaintiff stated that the plaintiff did not intend to make submissions in reply and would rely on the Court exercising its discretion regarding costs. [9] These are unusual proceedings and for new counsel to be properly briefed in order to advise on and bring the strike out application a significant amount of material would have had to have been canvassed. [10] In my judgment of 24 June 2011 I noted, for example, that there were...
...submitted on PC8.1 2. The Director-General’s submission supported the intent of PC8 to provide an interim planning regime: “… to improve the management of specific activities likely to be adversely affecting water quality in Otago while a new land and water management regime is prepared that gives full effect to the [National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020] NPSFM 2020.”2 3. The Director-General continues to support this intended purpose of PC8. Her subm...
DARREN PYNE v INVACARE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2023] NZEmpC 33 [7 March 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 33 EMPC 212/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF the extent/nature of the hearing BETWEEN DARREN PYNE Plaintiff AND INVACARE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the...
Section 32 Evaluation Report Consideration of alternatives, benefits and costs Proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago This Section 32 Evaluation Report should be read in conjunction with Proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago 18 March 2020 Section 32 Evaluation Report – Proposed Plan Change 7 18 March 2020 Page 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .........................................
...of NES-F 2020 and jurisdiction on appeals before this Court on Topics 7, 9 and 15 BAY OF ISLANDS MARITIME PARK INCORPORATED (ENV-2019-AKL-117) CEP SERVICES MA TAUWHI LIMITED (ENV-2019-AKL-111) ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV-2019-AKL-127) MAN GA WHAI HARBOUR RESTORATION SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2019-AKL-110) FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV-2019-AKL-114) MINISTER OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2019-AKL-122) Ap...
...case are so restricted that it may be possible to conclude the sentencing issue without a further formal hearing.” The Character Test [5] The leading case on the character test applicable under the 1976 Act was Sime v Real Estate Institute of New Zealand & Anor M73/86 HC Auckland, 30 July 1986. Sime established that the character test had two stages: [a] First, an enquiry into whether the person’s character, in the sense of his personal qualities, reputation and behaviour, r...
...[1] In July 2019 Ms A filed a complaint against C Limited (C). Ms A’s complaint related to the way Ms E carried out a workplace investigation for Ms A’s previous employer. Ms A also said that Ms D and Ms E, were providing private investigation services through their company C without the necessary certificate or licence. [2] I referred the complaint to the Complaints, Investigation and Prosecution Unit (CIPU) to investigate whether C, Ms E or Ms D were carrying out work that requi...
...impact negatively on those relationships. However, the Trustees were required to respond to the injunction application and their decision to do so was not unreasonable. Whether the nature of their response was reasonable is a question I will address in terms of determining the amount of any costs award. [24] Because the application did not proceed to hearing, the evidence filed with the Court was not tested. The Trustees contest the allegation that they did not respond to the appli...
...notification of Court matters. Importantly, in 2005 the Court sent him minutes of the 3 June 2005 hearing and the 8 July 2005 decision of Deputy Chief Judge Isaac. [31] The letter that the Parkers sent to the Court dated 23 May 2005 gives their addresses as 61 Wilson Road, Flaxmere, Hastings and 31 Shrimpton Road, Haumoana. It is noted that all notices, minutes, decisions and applications of the Court have been sent to these two addresses. Rule 12 of the Maori Land Court Rules and...