Search Results

1. 0323323-Ministry-of-Justice_National-Panui-May-2023-PROOF.pdf [pdf, 823 KB]

   ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz MAY | HARATUA 2023 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confirmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more information, please contact your local Mäori Land Court office. Individual

2. [2024] NZEnvC 255 Friends of Nelson Haven v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 551 KB]

   FONH v MDC – DECISION AS TO SCOPE IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 255 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN FRIENDS OF NELSON HAVEN AND TASMAN BAY INC (ENV-2020-CHC-33) Appellant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: at Christchurch on 8 October 2024

3. [2014] NZEmpC 154 Fox v Hereworth School Trust Board [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...terms, but also of the plaintiff’s independent strategies which have included formal complaints to the Ministry; an independent investigation instigated by the plaintiff and/or her husband into the plaintiff’s dealings with the Napier Mediation Service; complaints to the Prime Minister, to the Solicitor-General and the Privacy Commissioner; and a complaint to, and investigation by, the Ombudsman. The Ministry says that, to this point, between 2,500 and 3,000 documents have been...

4. Pryazhnikov v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 471 KB]

   (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE NAME AND IDENTIFYING DETAILS OF A THIRD PARTY REFERRED TO IN THIS DECISION (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON REDACTED DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 This decision is to be cited as Pryazhnikov v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 49 Note publication restrictions. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 49 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA REFERENCE NO. HRRT 028/2019

5. [2022] NZEnvC 245 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...provided in the first interim decision. Appendix B to its memorandum sets out QLDC’s position on the final expression of the provisions for inclusion in the Plan.5 In some respects, however, these Appendices go beyond those directions. We address that shortly. [7] Supplementary submissions were filed on behalf of various parties represented by Anderson Lloyd (previously referred to as Darby Planning Ltd Partnership and others (‘Anderson Lloyd parties’)).6 Queenstown Parks...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 61 Leota v Parcel Express Ltd [pdf, 465 KB]

   MIKA LEOTA v PARCEL EXPRESS LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 61 [7 May 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 61 EMPC 167/2019 IN THE MATTER OF application for a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN MIKA LEOTA Plaintiff AND PARCEL EXPRESS LIMITED Defendant AND FREIGHTWAYS LIMITED Intervener Hearing: 20-2...

7. [2022] NZEmpC 200 Stewart v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 309 KB]

   JAMES STEWART v AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2022] NZEmpC 200 [8 November 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZEmpC 200 EMPC 125/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JAMES STEWART Plaintiff AND AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 12 September 2022 (heard at Wellington)...

8. 11.1. Appendix 1 to JWS 11 - Draft Amendments to PC7 [pdf, 359 KB]

   ...text used to show the amendments recommended on matters discussed by witnesses in the expert conferencing is the text of the Plan Change as recommended in the Supplementary Statement of Evidence of Tom De Pelsemaeker dated 14 March 2021. All new text proposed based on matters agreed by witnesses in the expert conferencing over the period 24th March 2021 to 21 May 2021 and as shown in Appendix 1 to the 7th JWS (amended) 6 May 2021 is shown underlined. All text proposed to be om...

9. [2023] NZSSAA 7 (30 March 2023) [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...Grant Programme, TAS and main benefits which can be extended if exceptional circumstances exist. 4 [11.8] Further, the interpretation is consistent with the purpose of the Home Help Programme being temporary as it involves both a new application to verify eligibility and to verify exceptional circumstances. [11.9] Exceptional circumstances can be easily verified through the application form. The Ministry’s own records can also confirm if not receiving a grant...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 204 Here v McAlphine Hussman Ltd [pdf, 140 KB]

    ...as a serious threat. He was extremely shaken and felt panicked by the incident. He was aware (because Mr Here had previously told him) of a domestic incident involving Mr Here ripping a telephone off a wall and Police intervention. He also knew that Mr Here knew where he lived, given that he had visited him previously. Mr McAuley was sufficiently concerned that he contacted the Police to report the threat, and also contacted his security company instructing them that, if the sec...