Search Results

1. AQ v ZF LCRO 243/2012 (26 March 2014) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...but they were unable to resolve the situation. Although the AQs said they were not refusing to pay Ms ZF’s fees, they said they remained disappointed in the advice and representation they had received. [5] The AQs laid their complaint to the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS), criticising the advice and representation they had received, and saying Ms ZF should reduce her fee because they received poor service from Ms RW. Standards Committee Process [6] NZLS recorded the AQs’ co...

2. OIA-111057-Document-pack.pdf [pdf, 12 MB]

   RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL IN FORMATION ACT 1982 2 The team in PX will facilitate the design of what this first phase could look like, and have discussed this with the PSA. This design work will take some time and, at this stage, I anticipate a consultation document being ready towards the end of February. It is important that you have your say on what you think might work. So please do reach out to your manager to discuss your views. You will be kept up to date on timeframes and dec

3. [2021] NZEnvC 164 Otago Regional Council [pdf, 4 MB]

   OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL – PLAN CHANGE 7 – INTERIM DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 164 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under s 142(2)(b) of the Act) BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2020-CHC-127)

4. [2021] NZEnvC 164 Otago Regional Council [pdf, 4 MB]

   OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL – PLAN CHANGE 7 – INTERIM DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 164 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under s 142(2)(b) of the Act) BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2020-CHC-127)

5. 5. Transcript (weeks 9 & 10 Dunedin) [pdf, 3 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF AND The Resource Management Act 1991 Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 28 June 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environm

6. 5. Transcript (weeks 9 & 10 Dunedin) [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF AND The Resource Management Act 1991 Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 28 June 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environm

7. Abraham v Auckland City Council [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...“Applicant” “Peter Hinton and Steven Miller”. The same document also names them as the “builders”. A “Project Information Memorandum” (“PIM”) dated 28 August 1996, confirming that the proposed building work could be undertaken, was addressed to the “Applicant” “P Hinton and S Miller”. On 18 June 1997 the Council wrote to Mr Hinton care of the architect advising that a final inspection had been completed and asking for two outstanding matters to be deal...

8. GR-to-the-LC-report-Third-Review-of-the-Evidence-Act-2006_Final.pdf [pdf, 487 KB]

   ...The report’s more minor recommendations include proposals to amend the wording of certain sections of the Act to resolve ambiguity and correct what appear to be drafting errors. 20 The more significant recommendations include: 20.1 Creating a new exception to the hearsay rule to allow hearsay statements2 from fearful witnesses to be admitted without them giving evidence in court (recommendations 3-4); 20.2 Either changing or clarifying the test for excluding improperly obtained ev...

9. Modifying-the-Sentencing-Reinstating-Three-Strikes-Amendment-Bill_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 876 KB]

   ...than 12 months’ imprisonment being used at this stage does not face these issues. 8tqrze51js 2024-10-17 11:58:59 S9(2)(h) I N C O N F I D E N C E 4 I N C O N F I D E N C E eligible for home detention can depend on whether a suitable address is available rather than just the seriousness of the offending. Option B: above 12 months’ imprisonment at each stage 17 Option B is to set a threshold of above 12 months’ imprisonment at each stage. On top of option A, it is e...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 148 Baker v Hauraki Rail Trail Ltd [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...company was not removed from the company register, amounting to $540. (d) A contribution towards the costs incurred in having Mr Maynard served with proceedings amounting to $500. There is clear evidence that Mr Maynard endeavoured to evade service. (e) Employment Court filing fees amounting to $204.44. [29] The total of these sums amounts to $1,597.77. I order that this amount be paid by both defendants again on a joint and several basis. The balance of the disbursement...