Search Results

1. [2013] NZEmpC 225 Labour Inspector v Civic City Ltd [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...own report from chartered accountants which examines the statements of financial position for the three respondents. This report, to which I will refer by the shorthand “the Pepper report”, notes, first, that there are no contact or other address details for “Smart Tax Solutions” although the Pepper report has identified that this may be a company called Smart Tax Solutions Limited which is a member of the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants. [15] The Pepper re...

2. O v S LCRO 35 / 2009 (2 June 2009) [pdf, 33 KB]

   ...that he was stressed with children and forgot. The present claim is materially based on Lawyer S and his advocate having attended a review hearing unnecessarily, thereby unnecessarily incurring costs. The claim is further based time involved in addressing Client O’s complaint which was considered to be without merit. [26] Client O was allowed to respond to the application. He wrote that he missed the hearing due to his own illness and the illness of his children on the two...

3. E60 Bob Hawkins - Nautical - EIC - Sealink [pdf, 711 KB]

   ...Arborist), any tree to be removed may be transplanted to another location or stored and replanted back within the vicinity of the project area, subject to the approval of Council’s Arborist. (d) Condition 132A: All works required to install services within Jellicoe Street shall be undertaken outside the below-ground rain garden structures. (e) Condition 135A: The Consent Holder shall supply a completion memorandum to the Team Leader Compliance Monitoring – Central upon c...

4. The Trustees of Part Rotomaha Parekarangi 8 Reservation v Cochrane - Part Rotomahana Pakrekarangi 8 Reservation (2020) 247 Waiariki MB 34 (247 WAR 34) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...agreed with Mr Harvey’s request that questions concerning a possible contour boundary fence should form part of the forestry expert’s report. He also agreed that Michael Colley be appointed as the forestry expert. [8] In addition, Mr Rendall addressed the issues raised by Mr Harvey concerning discovery from the second respondents. Ngā kōrero a ngā Kaitono Applicants’ submissions [9] Mr Koning, for the applicants, also filed a reply to those submissions on 20 October...

5. MC v SH [2020] NZDT 1544 (29 May 2020) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...deceive. Section 43 of the FTA provides the Tribunal with a wide discretion to provide an appropriate remedy where a person has been found to have breached the FTA. 5. The CGA creates a number of statutory guarantees upon the supplier of goods and services to a consumer, including the guarantee that the goods supplied will be of acceptable quality. The CGA also provides the right of redress against suppliers in respect of goods and services which do not comply with those guarantees. Th...

6. Auckland City Council as Assignee v Irwin [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...Irwin and after that meeting received favourable feedback to enquiries about Mr Irwin's firm. He said he wanted a "professional" person to oversee the whole project as he had never previously been involved in building a house and knew he would not have the time to spend on the project himself due to heavy business commitments. He did not understand the difference between a draftsperson and an architect and this difference was not explained to him. He believed he...

7. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 van Noort [2024] NZLCDT 33 (17 October 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2024] NZLCDT 33 LCDT 009/23 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WAIKATO BAY OF PLENTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND JOHANNES (JACQUES) VAN NOORT Practitioner CHAIR Ms D Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K King Ms A Kinzett Mr T Mackenzie Prof D Scott ON THE PAPERS DATE OF DECISION 17 October 2024 COUNSEL Ms E Mok fo...

8. Vivash v Accident Compensation Corporation [2020] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...[2] By email dated 21 June 2006 ACC replied that in relation to the first category, the physical claim file had been destroyed and the information held on it was no longer available. The request in relation to the second category was not expressly addressed but it would appear the response by ACC has been read by all parties as implying that this information also had been destroyed and was no longer available. [3] In these proceedings Mr Vivash claims that: [3.1] In relation to the fir...

9. Whooley - Ngaiotonga 1B1 and 2B1 and Lots 1 - 2, and 3 DP383105 (2014) 71 Taitokerau MB 38 (71 TTK 38) [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...counsel for the unrepresented owners. Mr Powell attended the second and third hearings, where Colin Handley took over from Mr Coutts in representing Mr Whooley. Mr Whooley’s position [12] Mr Whooley gave evidence in support of the exchange. He addressed the background to the application, his compliance with the Court’s directions and the details of the proposal in terms of the additional works and payments that he is prepared to undertake. The exchange will provide the Gene...

10. Final-Technical-Assessment-D-Landscape-Visual-and-Natural-Character-v2.pdf [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    ...CH Chainage (reference distance along project north to south) HDP Horowhenua District Plan KCDP Kāpiti Coast District Plan MCA Multi criteria analysis MCI Macroinvertebrate community index NOR Notice of Requirement NZILA Tuia Pito Ora / New Zealand Institute of Landscape Architects NIMT North Island Main Trunk railway NZUP New Zealand Upgrade Programme Ō2NL Ōtaki to North of Levin Highway Project (the Project) ONL Outstanding natural landscape ONFL Outstanding natural f...