Search Results

1. [2023] NZEmpC 225 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Prisha’s Hospitality (2017) Ltd T/A Royal Cambridge Indian Restaurant [pdf, 302 KB]

   A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT v PRISHA’S HOSPITALITY (2017) LIMITED TRADING AS ROYAL CAMBRIDGE INDIAN RESTAURANT [2023] NZEmpC 225 [8 December 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 225 EMPC 450/2019 IN THE MATTER OF minimum employment standards – applications for exercise of powers under Part 9A of the Employment Relations Act...

2. Henton v CAC 20003 & Ors [2014] NZREADT 2 [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...Childcare Centre sought to fit in with neighbours. The e-mail (from Tessa Apa, one of the tenants) reads: “Hi Debbie Lee (sorry hope this is your name ☺ We are the tenants at 1 Ranier Street. We will be opening a Childcare Centre there in the New Year. Can you please confirm whether the new owners of 5b Ranier Street are aware of this. The main issue is that we are required by Council to build a 2m high solid timber acoustic fence on that boundary. This will be viewed by...

3. McCleery – Waihaha 3D2 Inc (1997) 1 Waiariki Appellate MB 67 (1 AP 67) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...incorporation to be a member of a committee of management is inconsistent with the context of the Act and the Maori Incorporations Regulations. While we tend to agree we see no need to rule on this issue but merely raise it as something that may need to be addressed by the Incorporation in the future. WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS Mr Powell, for the Appellants, criticised the Lower Court for its refusal to accept written submissions from Counsel for the Incorporation at the hearing on 16 August 19...

4. AC v FV & HU LCRO 318/2012 (27 November 2014) [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...was, he submitted, for me to determine. [26] That was the only order that could be made. The Law Practitioners Act did not provide for any compensatory order to be made in these circumstances. [27] In her complaint to the Lawyers Complaints Service Mrs AC sought compensation. She in fact sought to recover the total amount of $34,000 that she alleges she had lost by reason of Ms HU’s conduct. She argued she was entitled to recover up to $25,000 in respect of each contract be...

5. [2025] NZEmpC 49 Matheson v Rainbow Confectionery Ltd [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...prejudice or hardship to any other person [39] The parties did not point to any prejudice or hardship to any other person in granting or refusing the application. The effect on the rights and liabilities of the parties [40] Ms Matheson did not address this topic specifically, although her submissions emphasised a concern about an alleged miscarriage of justice in Rainbow Confectionery’s actions which she considered needs to be addressed. Ms Copeland’s submission was that the...

6. Apostolakis v Public Trust (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...relied on in these proceedings. The affidavit was required to exhibit the document said to contain the request. Mrs Apostolakis was also required to provide particulars of the date on which the request was served and of the circumstances of such service. The formal direction was in the following terms: [11.5] By 5pm on Friday 17 November 2017 Mrs Apostolakis is to file and serve an affidavit exhibiting the document which she asserts is the specific Principle 6 request (for personal i...

7. Waikato Regional Council [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...submissions on the Proposed Plan when it is lodged with the Environment Court; (c) provide copies of the Decision when it is lodged with the Environment Court; and (d) provide the Registrar of the Environment Court with a list of the name and address of each person required to be served with the Notice of Appeal, and the date of service on each such person. DATED this 7th of July 2020. _____________________ Signature of appellant Page 4 Notice of Appeal - PC1...

8. McQuade v Young & Ors as Trustees for the Maureen Young Family Trust [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...Fortune Architects. The revised drawings numbered W9 and W10 were prepared and they altered the layout from the original drawings and they showed harditex cladding to the exterior and the Architect added a note: CONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW ZEALAND BUILDING ACT AND CODE INCLUSIVE OF NZS 3604. AS 3500.2 FOR PLUMBING SERVICES. It was apparent from the evidence that these drawings were never given to the Porirua City Council and no amended drawings were requested by them....

9. [2015] NZEmpC 34 Rodkiss v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...and the respective contentions of both parties were well presented. Background [4] Mr Rodkiss is 58 years of age. He qualified in production and mechanical engineering in the United Kingdom in the mid-1980s. He and his wife immigrated to New Zealand from the Scottish Borders in April 2002, basically for a "better lifestyle". Initially, he worked with Fletcher Challenge Forestry at their Kawarau sawmill in the Bay of Plenty. As from 5 August 2002, as a result of a tak...

10. [2018] NZEnvC 214 King v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 13 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC '2. ~ it- of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 of an appeal pursuant to s 58 of the Act BETTY KING, PANIA NEWTON, NGA KAITIAKI 0 IHUMATAO CHARITABLE TRUST and SOUL IHUMATAO (ENV-2017 -AKL-000160) Appellants HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respo