Search Results

1. Nelson Standards Committee v Downing and Reith [2022] NZLCDT 7 (17 February 2022) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...conceded by the practitioners in their submissions that “…the ultimatum in relation to the fees was imposed without any sufficient prior indication or warning to Ms [L]. The unpaid fees had been left for a long period without being directly addressed but the consequences were clearly spelt out for Ms [L] to consider and deal with”. Further they accept that they “failed to provide adequate advance warning of this decision” which then meant that the client had “limited tim...

2. IncreasingRevenuefromCourtsandTribunalFeesandCollectionsServices.pdf [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   Hon Paul Goldsmith Minister of Justice Proactive release: Increasing Revenue from Courts and Tribunal Fees and Collections Services Date of issue: 4 July 2024 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted a

3. LCRO 263/2015 DH v EI (12 May 2017) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...Introduction [1] Mr DH has applied for a review of the determination by [City] Standards Committee [X] that Mr DH’s conduct constituted unsatisfactory conduct. The Committee censured Mr DH, imposed a fine of $3,000 and ordered him to pay the New Zealand Law Society $2,000 by way of costs. [2] A fact that must be noted immediately is that Mr DH sought and acted on advice from senior counsel. The Committee has in effect disagreed with counsel’s advice by finding that Mr DH...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 115 Auckland Council v KI Braines [pdf, 403 KB]

   ...own actions, put himself in a position where he has multiple tenancies on the site which, on the face of it, are clearly in breach of the current District Plan. Although Mr Braines has argued about existing use rights, that is not a matter I can address in any detail today. Suffice to say that is disputed by the Council. [26] The purpose of enforcement proceedings in the Resource Management Act is to ensure that the environmental outcomes sought are maintained. The Plans themselves...

5. [2020] NZIACDT 36 Y(O)R v Tian (7 August 2020) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...here. [5] Ms Tian, a licensed immigration adviser, is a director of Abstract Solution Limited, of Auckland. [6] On 30 September 2014, Ms Tian lodged an entrepreneur work visa application for the complainant. It was declined by Immigration New Zealand on 7 August 2015, but she did not advise the complainant of the decision. Eventually, the complainant found out from Immigration New Zealand on 30 August 2017 that the application had been declined two years previously. [7] Me...

6. LCRO 70/2018 AR v NM (10 April 2019) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...met with Mrs AR. He signed two notes written by Mrs AR in her own handwriting. First, his instructions to Mrs NM to withdraw his Notice of Claim, revoke the appointment of his sister as his attorney, and reappoint Mrs AR. In the second note, addressed “[t]o whom it may concern”, Mr AR stated he agreed to Mrs AR, as his attorney, removing the Notice of Claim. [11] Mrs AR says at the meeting with Mrs NM that followed, Mrs NM “ripped up” Mr AR’s instructions and “accused...

7. [2021] NZACC 6 - MacDonald v ACC (12 January 2021) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...2019 by Mr Langley. He identified five job options that he thought would be vocationally suitable for the appellant; small business owner and/or manager, motor vehicle or caravan salesperson, importer or exporter, purchasing officer and customer services representative. [35] The appellant subsequently contacted the Corporation to indicate that he disagreed with the VIOA. He reportedly asked for assistance regarding the stress, depression and anger he gets, but indicated that he...

8. [2019] NZEnvC 141 SKP Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...documents available for inspection, in accordance with rule 8.27, to the party or parties specified in the order. (3) An application for an order under subclause (2) must be made on notice to the person and to every other party who has filed an address for service. [21] Counsel for SKP submitted that evidence produced on behalf of KPB disclosed a close relationship between the applicant and the iwi trust, in a number of respects particularly meetings, discussions, and the commissi...

9. Ngati Pahauwera Affidavit on behalf of Trustees Exhibits J to NN [pdf, 15 MB]

   " J" R eprint as at 19 N ovem ber 2004 Water Conservation (Mohaka River) Order 2004 (SR 2004/397) Silvia Cartwright, Governor-General Order in Council At Wellington this 15th day of November 2004 Present: The Right Hon Helen Clark presiding in Council Pursuant to sections 214 and 423 of the Resource Management Act 1991, Her Excellency the Governor-General, acting on the advice and with the consent o f the Executive Council, makes the following order. Changes authorised

10. Appendix-14-Regional-Councils-Response-to-combined-request-for-information-under-section-92.pdf [pdf, 538 KB]

    Level 5, The Majestic Centre 100 Willis Street PO Box 5084 Wellington 6011 New Zealand T 64 4 894 5200 F 64 4 894 3305 www.nzta.govt.nz 1 Tēnā tātou, Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project- – Response to request for additional information pursuant to section 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 This letter provides a response to the request for further information pursuant to section 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“RMA”) re