Search Results

1. 5_WK-respose-to-Regional-Councils-request-for-information-under-section-92-final-v2.pdf [pdf, 538 KB]

   Level 5, The Majestic Centre 100 Willis Street PO Box 5084 Wellington 6011 New Zealand T 64 4 894 5200 F 64 4 894 3305 www.nzta.govt.nz 1 Tēnā tātou, Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project- – Response to request for additional information pursuant to section 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 This letter provides a response to the request for further information pursuant to section 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“RMA”) re

2. E94 John Mckensey – Lighting - RE – Applicant [pdf, 4.5 MB]

   ...work environment. 2. It is noted that AS4282-1997 and the America’s Cup Physical Infrastructure Technical Report (Beca, April 2018) recommend the use of luminaires with asymmetric light distribution. However, construction lighting available in New Zealand is seldom equipped with such luminaires, therefore, the Project shall mitigate light spill and glare by minimising tilt. This will achieve the same outcomes. 3. Mount flood lights high and aimed downwards to minimise light spill (Fig...

3. Merso v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for Social Rehabilitation) [2024] NZACC 193 [pdf, 307 KB]

   ...October 2019) substantially subsumes the first decision (5 February 2019), that is, substantially the same issues arise, for a similar time period and for the periods prior, back to the time of birth. Counsel submit that the matter can properly be addressed by addressing the second decision, with reference to all evidence. Counsel for Ms Merso accepts that, if the appeal in respect of the second decision does not succeed, the appeal in respect of the first cannot succeed for the s...

4. Henton v CAC302 & Barfoot & Thompson Ltd [2015] NZREADT 70 [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...the complainant raises two further concerns arising from the Tribunal decision. 1.6 Firstly, the complainant states that the licensee deducted its commission from the deposit paid on the sale of the property, in circumstances where the licensee knew that the sale and purchase agreement was under threat and the purchaser of the property had attempted to cancel the agreement and seek return of the deposit. The complainant feels that because it was the action of one of their salespeople...

5. LCRO 116/2015 QO v Standards Committee (14 June 2018) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...copy the files. Ms QO says that although by then the file ran to around 20,000 pages, she decided against sending them to a commercial copier outside the firm. Ms QO considered that attracted an unacceptable risk to Mrs MN’s privacy. She knew Mrs MN was very sensitive about her privacy and she did not know if or how Mrs MN’s privacy would be protected if she was not holding the materials. [17] Various members of the firm’s support staff photocopied Mrs MN’s files. It...

6. DIJ v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...PLAINTIFF AND THE TRANSCRIPT REFERRED TO IN THIS DECISION (3) PERMANENT ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON REDACTED DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 This decision is to be cited as DIJ v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 22. Note publication restrictions. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 22 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA REFERENCE NO. HRRT 28/2021 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN DIJ PLAINTI...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 159 Q v W [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...of an alternative way of dealing with the application for particulars. That memorandum had invited the plaintiff to file a further amended statement of claim in accordance with reg 11 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000 (the regulations) addressing the claim for further and better particulars sought by the defendant. [5] The plaintiff opposed the making of the orders sought by the defendant and declined to file an amended statement of claim. She contended that all facts and...

8. [2019] NZEnvC 052 Tasman Distrct Council v Baigent [pdf, 628 KB]

   ...adequately explained to the Court the meanings or implications of the terms "fully functioning wetlands" or "self-restoring wetlands" which was a matter of dispute between them. I determine that the condition should require the new restoration plan to '" "describe measures to remediate both areas as functioning wetlands". [11] The next amendment to Condition 3(a) sought by Mr Baigent was a provision stating that he was not required to remove m...

9. Memorandum of Counsel for Wellington International Airport Limited (dated 07 May 2018) [pdf, 825 KB]

   ...effeols thai rosuff from the constrllCtkm and operation of ~ runway eX/(msion and ali asso(;ii!led infraStruduro; b, Managing com;lmclion acWi!l1lS assodallJd wilh a runway extension Iu enable exlsling regional, natlonai and intematlonai aviation services lD 'Continue af Wflilingt?n Airport In omer to moollhe onfj!lillg nelJds 01 the nalional and I~gionai communily; and . c, EflSuring Ihat appropnate methods are amployed 10 mjtigate, to tile axlent pradicabie, any adverse envir...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 197 Electrical Union 2001 Inc and Anor v Mighty River Power [pdf, 239 KB]

    ELECTRICAL UNION 2001 INCORPORATED v MIGHTY RIVER POWER LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 197 [24 October 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 197 ARC 21/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ELECTRICAL UNION 2001 INCORPORATED First Plaintiff AND DEAN GREGORY COWELL Second Plaintiff AND MIGHTY RIVER POWER LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 30 Au