Search Results

1. Ms L v REAA Registrar [2013] NZREADT 47 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...There is no premeditation and the offending was of limited duration. Finally, Mr Dacre submits that there was no suggestion that you were involved in the manufacturing process, or that you gained any benefit and I accept that is the case. Mr Dacre addresses the issue of a community-based sentence and I will address that in a moment. [14] He had referred to the fact that you are a good and responsible mother, of previous good character and holding a responsible job in the community and...

2. Dotcom v Crown Law Office [2018] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 944 KB]

   ...decision is to be cited as: Dotcom v Crown Law Office [2018] NZHRRT 7. Note publication restrictions.] 2 AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL Second Defendant AND DEPARTMENT OF THE PRIME MINISTER AND CABINET Third Defendant AND IMMIGRATION NEW ZEALAND Fourth Defendant AND MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT Fifth Defendant AND MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE Sixth Defendant AND MINISTRY OF JUSTICE Seventh Defendant AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE...

3. Recommendations recap - issue 14 [pdf, 891 KB]

   ...increasing opportunities to enjoy good heath in the communities it serves, and for those communities to be sustained by healthy environments. Hāpai cite a strategic focus supported with evidence-based research in local and national communities to address health inequity.21 Hāpai hold four national service contracts, including for the National SUDI Prevention Co-ordination Service (NSPCS). This provides a centralised and integrated approach to SUDI prevention in New Zealand. They...

4. [2020] NZEnvC 159 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council.pdf [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...remainder. 4 Relevant provisions [4] According to that approach, Decision 2.2 went on to set out revisions to what QLDC had proposed in its closing submissions for Ch 3 strategic objectives as to an EZF. Specifically, the revisions comprised new 'interpretation and application' provisions (3.1 B.5 and 3.1 B.6) and a new SO 3.2.5.1A. The provisional drafting was as follows: 3.1B.5 3.1B.6 3.2.5.1A In 3.1 B.6 and SO 3.2.5.1 A and 3.2.5.2A, 'Exception Zone' m...

5. [2012] NZLCDT 14 Auckland Standards Committee v ABC [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...name allowed by s 240 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 should also take into account the purposes of the Act as set out in s 3. Specifically, the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act is intended to maintain public confidence in the provision of legal services, to protect consumers of those services, and to recognise the status of the legal profession. [48] In S v Wellington District Law Society the Full Court reflected this when it said:8 “...whether the tribunal or Court, or...

6. External Sector Feedback Document [pdf, 337 KB]

   ........................................................................................................ 2 Using on-site audits for a wider range of providers ............................................................................ 2 Introducing the new ‘on-site’ audit process ....................................................................................... 3 Inserting the audit site as a new point of information given to providers ......................................... 3...

7. Tweeddale v Pearson [pdf, 405 KB]

   ...Pearson, Ms Tucker and Mr Harley claimed that the claim is statute barred by the Limitation Act 1950. These parties did not refer to s 37 which provides a special approach to accounting for limitation periods under 12 the Act. This topic was not addressed by any substantive submissions and I treat it as abandoned. Is the house a commercial building and so outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction? Was the house a commercial building? [54] Some parties placed reliance on the...

8. Hutcheson v Houkamau - Porangahau 2B No 10 (2021) 88 Takitimu MB 118 (88 TKT 118) [pdf, 581 KB]

   88 Tākitimu MB 118 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TĀKITIMU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tākitimu District A20180005757 WĀHANGA Under Regulation 21, Māori Reservation Regulations 1994 Sections 37, 236, 237, 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Porangahau 2B No 10 and Other Blocks (Rongomaraeroa Marae) I WAENGA I A Between AIMEE WHAITIRI HUTCHESON, NICHOLAS REIHANA

9. Heta - Taiharuru 4C3B (2010) 13 Taitokerau MB 203 (13 TTK 203) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...of the Court in the past and is the very concern expressed by the owners of Taiharuru 4C3B. Is there a reasonable alternative to the proposed partition? [21] Sections 288(1) and (2) are satisfied, subject to owners’ prohibition on sale being addressed. As is often the case, the key issue is whether s 288(4) is satisfied. In other words, is there a reasonable alternative to the partition proposed by Mr Heta? [22] In my view, a hybrid partition is a reasonable alternative given th...

10. [2011] NZEmpC 144 NZ Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 131 KB]

    NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC V AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 144 [2 November 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 144 ARC 67/11 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC Plaintiff AND AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 27 - 29 September 2011 (heard at Tauranga) 12 October...