8021 items matching your search terms
...proposed mitigation. I oppose the relief sought because – please see attached. I agree to participate in mediation or other alternative dispute resolution of the proceedings. Signature of person wishing to be a party 12/9/21 Date Address for service of person wishing to be a party: 45 Kinleith Way, Albany Telephone: 09 443 8034 Fax/Email: juliaclements45@gmail.com I object to the Kristin School proposal to use the Bass Rd entry exit of their school. The...
PERMANENT ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE NAME AND IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE AFFECTED PERSON, INCLUDING THE NATURE OF ANY CONNECTION WITH THE APPLICANT. THE INTERIM ORDERS PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE FORMER JUDGE AND BACKGROUND CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE COMPLAINT HAVE BEEN LIFTED BUT WILL REMAIN IN FORCE UNTIL 22 JULY 2022. JUDICIAL CONDUCT PANEL JCP 1/2022 UNDER the Judicial Conduct Commissioner and Judicial Con
...response to the original submission on costs that he had no instructions. Once the challenge was filed, Mr Whitehead appears to have prepared and filed a statement of defence on his own behalf. Subsequently, and apparently because he instructed new solicitors, the solicitor then representing him filed an address for service and also filed a submission in answer to the plaintiff’s submissions, following agreement that this matter could be dealt with on the documents. It will be...
...ORDERS............................................................................... 58 Page 3 INTRODUCTION [1] The claimants, Mr and Mrs Greaterex are the owners of the home at Corinth Street, Remuera, Auckland. It is a leaky building as defined by section 2 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (“the 2006 Act”). The claimants seek judgment for the sum of $525,420.00. This includes the cost of repairs together with alternative accommodation...
...to each relevant step, the second respondent’s assessment is that it is entitled to $6,811.50. This includes an allocation for preparation of written submissions regarding costs. The second respondent says that being a publicly-funded health service provider, it has a fiscal obligation to recover costs where costs are payable. It says it has been entirely successful and has incurred significant unnecessary costs. It is on that basis that it now seeks an order for $6,811.50....
CONCRETE STRUCTURES (NZ) LIMITED v ADRIAN ROTTIER [2021] NZEmpC 95 [30 June 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 95 EMPC 376/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CONCRETE STRUCTURES (NZ) LIMITED Plaintiff AND ADRIAN ROTTIER Defendant Hearing: 17 and 18 May 2020 (Heard at Rotoru...
IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2023] NZIACDT [9] Reference No: IACDT 011/22 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN WS Complainant AND JOHN DESMOND LAWLOR Adviser SUBJECT TO SUPPRESSION ORDER DECISION Dated 23 March 2023 REPRESENTATION: Registra
...just about holding steady because of the uncertainty. Q. I guess that was a question I had, I mean, you’ve talked about the bigger 30 process that you’re working on, and then PC7 comes along. A. Yeah. Q. So is it capable, then, of being addressed in terms of controlled activity in terms of PC7? 13 OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL PLAN CHANGE 7 – ENV-ENV-2020-CHC-127 (08 March 2021) A. All of those wider matters? Q. Well, I’m not sure all of those wider matters are. Tha...
...established, the stay application relates to only 16 of these charges: the three remaining charges laid by the National Standards Committee in 2011, and the 13 charges laid by the Auckland Standards Committee in 2010. Mr Orlov has not sought to address the two most recent charges laid by the National Standards Committee in 2014. As an alternative to permanent stay Mr Orlov has sought to vacate the currently allocated hearing dates or to have a separate viva voce hearing on abuse o...
...of an appeal against my decision in Samuels v Matauri X Incorporation2 1 140 Whangarei MB 79 which concerned a similar issue of indemnity costs, I would await the outcome of the appeal before addressing costs, unless counsel objected. Counsel did not 2 Samuels v Matauri X Incorporation (2008) 124 Whangarei MB 141(124 Wh 141) 12 Taitokerau MB 177 object. The Māori Appellate Court has since issued its decision, Samuels v...