Search Results

1. HM v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury) [2024] NZACC 004 [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...realised there was no one there. I was obviously hallucinated and what I had thought was weed eaters was just grass. I found it very hard looking for a way out of the hollow as I was so dizzy and shaky. I eventually found a way out. For some reason I knew if I didn’t get out then I wouldn’t get out at all. 7. I stumbled down the forestry road and when I eventually got to where people leave their vehicles instead of going on the beach, I asked some men if this was the way to Mu...

2. [2008] Ryan Security & Consulting (Otago) Ltd v Bolton [Full Court (Chief Judge Colgan, Judges Shaw and Couch) CC 11/08 [pdf, 49 KB]

   ...and also to two other defendants, Up Front Security Limited and Lipika Limited (trading as The Toast Bar). That meeting was held on 18 December 2007. [4] The Authority issued an interim injunction restraining Mr Bolton from providing security services of the type provided by Ryan Security to any person for whom Ryan Security had provided such services within a period of 12 months prior to 4 November 2007. There was a further interlocutory injunction requiring Mr Bolton to abide...

3. VL v SB LCRO 142/2014 & 160/2014 (12 October 2015) [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...other sister, was resolved by mediation in April 2013. The agreement reached was recorded in a Deed of Family Arrangement. [5] Mr SB became unhappy with Mr VL’s administration of the estates and lodged a complaint with the Lawyers Complaints Service. The complaints and the Standards Committee determination [6] The Standards Committee recorded Mr SB’s complaints as being:1 (a) Unbecoming conduct in relation to the manner in which Mr VL administered the two estates; (b)...

4. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Holland [2022] NZLCDT 9 (3 March 2022) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...THE TRIBUNAL REGARDING LIABILITY [1] Ms Holland is charged with misconduct under s 7(1)(b)(ii) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (“the Act”). This provision expressly targets conduct unconnected with the provision of regulated services. The rationale for the extension to such conduct is found in its statutory threshold: the conduct “would justify a finding that the lawyer … is not a fit and proper person or is unsuited to engage in practice as a lawyer ….”...

5. Ratahi v Parininihi Ki Waitotara Incorporation - Section 53 Block IX Opunake SD being part Ngati Kahumate Block comprised in CT D4/240 (2007) 195 Aotea MB 127 (195 AOT 127) [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...being provided with that 0ppOItunity. This will mean that evidence will need to be briefed, including valuation evidence, which was clearly in Mrs Hughes' contemplation as at 24 February 2006. I understand from her submissions that the Legal Services Agency has agreed to support her clients' case but that a question remains over the funding of expert evidence. If the Agency's response is negative I would be prepared to entertain an application for assistance from the...

6. MFE-Your-Guide-to-the-Environment-Court.pdf [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...the evidence to be called. You will need to state the resource management factors relevant to your case, and the legal principles upon which you rely. Address the Court appropriately Judges are referred to as ‘Your Honour’. The Commissioners are addressed as ‘Mr Commissioner’ or ‘Madam Commissioner’. Follow the instructions or advice given by the Court During the hearing, you should follow any advice given to you by the Court or its officers. They will try to ensure everyone und...

7. [2021] NZEmpC 137 Coetzee v Oamaru Meats Ltd [pdf, 280 KB]

   VERNON COETZEE v OAMARU MEATS LIMITED [2021] NZEmpC 137 [18 August 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 137 EMPC 230/2020 EMPC 353/2020 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN VERNON COETZEE Plaintiff AND OAMARU MEATS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 13–14 May 2021 (Heard at Timaru) Appeara...

8. [2007] NZEmpC WC 10B/07 Smith & Anor v Harvey [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...cash in hand, thereafter, an hourly rate of $14.00 per hour Gross will apply. Confidentiality is vital. All business matters discussed shall not be disclosed at anytime to third parties, with the exception of the spouse. Any problems can be addressed by Majti or Darryl, either of us will be willing to help in any way we can. [15] The reference to Mr Harvey initially being paid “cash in hand” was included in the employment agreement because Mr Smith said that the plaintiffs...

9. [2007] NZEmpC AC 10/07 X v Auckland DHB [pdf, 338 KB]

   ...standing. The performance of his work had never attracted any serious criticism and he enjoys prestigious respect internationally for his research work. The plaintiff is based at Auckland City Hospital where ADHB provides most, if not all, its services in his speciality. He works entirely within the public health sector. [7] At the time of his dismissal, the plaintiff held the dual positions of Director of [the hospital’s relevant specialist unit] and Director of Research [in thi...

10. Body Corporate 81738 v Wellington City Council [2010] NZWHT Wellington 15 [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...APPORTIONMENT.........................................................................................25 X ORDERS SOUGHT ........................................................................................26 XI CONCLUSION AND ORDERS .......................................................................26 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES New Zealand Jurisdiction Body Corporate 183523 v Tony Tay & Associates Ltd HC Auckland CIV-2004-404- 4824, 30 March 2009 ..................................