Search Results

1. 2021-04-12 Transcript (up to end of day 15) [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...just about holding steady because of the uncertainty. Q. I guess that was a question I had, I mean, you’ve talked about the bigger 30 process that you’re working on, and then PC7 comes along. A. Yeah. Q. So is it capable, then, of being addressed in terms of controlled activity in terms of PC7? 13 v – ENV-2020-CHC-127 (14 Apr 2021) A. All of those wider matters? Q. Well, I’m not sure all of those wider matters are. That’s the purpose of my question. I mean...

2. Transcript - Hearing - PC7 - 12 April 2021 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...just about holding steady because of the uncertainty. Q. I guess that was a question I had, I mean, you’ve talked about the bigger 30 process that you’re working on, and then PC7 comes along. A. Yeah. Q. So is it capable, then, of being addressed in terms of controlled activity in terms of PC7? 13 v – ENV-2020-CHC-127 (14 Apr 2021) A. All of those wider matters? Q. Well, I’m not sure all of those wider matters are. That’s the purpose of my question. I mean...

3. Puna - Rotopounamu 1B3A2C (2018) 70 Tākitimu MB 143 (70 TKT 143) [pdf, 574 KB]

   70 Tākitimu MB 143 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TĀKITIMU DISTRICT A20170004759 UNDER Sections 238 and 67, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rotopounamu 1B3A2C BETWEEN TE ROERA (ROYAL) PUNA, DONNA PUNA-MANGU AND ANNA BARTLETT Applicants Hearing: 63 Tākitimu MB 44-53 dated 7 September 2017 3 May 2018 Judgment: 31 July 2018 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY

4. LCRO 121/2023 AI v HR (12 December 2023) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...satisfied there is a prima facie case that the communication was made or received, or the information was compiled or prepared, for a dishonest purpose or to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit what the person claiming the privileged new, or reasonably should have known, to be an offence.” [41] Having determined that it had the power to disallow privilege, the Committee declined to form a view as to whether any grounds had been made out for doing so and accordingly whethe...

5. [2021] NZEmpC 91 A1 Communication Ltd v A Labour Inspector of Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [pdf, 265 KB]

   A1 COMMUNICATION LIMITED v A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT [2021] NZEmpC 91 [23 June 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 91 EMPC 5/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN A1 COMMUNICATION LIMITED First Plaintiff AND HAROLD DEO Second Plaintiff AND...

6. ZA v YB LCRO 164/2013 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...closed. [5] The High Court’s comments clarify that the passing of a deadline imposed by a LCRO does not preclude late filing by a party. If late-filed correspondence may affect the filing party’s rights, receipt of it should be recorded and addressed in the decision. Practically, a filing deadline is unlikely to be effective if the decision in question is not ready to sign when the deadline expires, as was the case with the costs decision in . Thus my failure to record receipt...

7. ZA v YB LCRO 135/2014 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...him to attend to those matters, apologised for “the slight tardiness”, and indicated he awaited a response. [17] On 10 May Mr [YB] said there were no matters he wished to raise. 3 Section 27 New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, the Statutes of Westminister; the First 1275, the Magna Carta 1297, the Observance of Due Process of Law Statute 1368, the Criminal and Civil Justice Statute 1351, the Criminal and Civil Justice Statute 1354,...

8. Huata v Robin - Rotopounamu 1B1A (2017) 60 Takitimu MB 7 (60 TKT 7) [pdf, 339 KB]

   60 Tākitimu MB 7 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20150004913 A20150003172 A20140012724 UNDER Section 67, 315 and 326(b), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rotopounamu 1B1A BETWEEN GARY HUATA, BRENDA NICOLE KUPA, PATON LUXFORD, DAVID WHATANUI PUNA, TE ROERA CLIVE DAVID PUNA AND JEAN YORSTEN AS TRUSTEES OF ROTOPOUNAMU 1B1A AHU WHENUA TRUST AND PETER ROBIN, RAYMOND PUNA, NI...

9. [2018] NZEnvC 088 Clearwater Mussels Limited v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 21 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 88 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of appeals pursuant to s1 20 of the Act BETWEEN CLEARWATER MUSSELS LIMITED (ENV-2016-CHC-40 and 41) Appellant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Environment Commissioner J A Hodges Hearing: at Christchurch on 4-7 December 2017 Appearances: Q

10. NZCASS in an international context: comparing the New Zealand Crime & Safety Survey with other international surveys [pdf, 253 KB]

    www.justice.govt.nz Ministry of Justice, P O Box 180, Wellington, New Zealand Corp 425 ISBN: 978-0-478-29094-2 Justice Sector Strategy THE NZCASS IN AN INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT: Comparing the New Zealand Crime and Safety Survey with other international victim surveys December 2010 Summary A number of consistent findings have emerged from the NZCASS, national-level victimisation surveys in other countries and the International Crime Victims Survey in rela...