Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 170 Director-General of Conservation v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...Andrews for Te Make Farms and Te Rarawa Faming Limited T Hovell and J Te Rata for Te Aupōuri Commercial Development Limited G Mathias and C Sharp for Northland Regional Council P Anderson and W Jennings for Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society New Zealand Incorporated (Forest and Bird) S Ryan for Far North Aquifer Protection Group Incorporated Mr A Burgoyne (no appearance) Date of Decision: 7 September 2022 Date of Issue: 7 September 2022 __________________________________...

2. Ratu v Marshall - Whangape Lot 65B Sec 2A [2023] Māori Appellate Court MB 115 (2023 APPEAL 115) [pdf, 383 KB]

   2023 Māori Appellate Court MB 115 Ratu v Marshall - Whangape Lot 65B Sec 2A [2023] Māori Appellate Court MB 115 (2023 APPEAL 115) I TE KOOTI PĪRA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O WAIKATO MANIAPOTO In the Māori Appellate Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District A20210012662 APPEAL 2021/6 WĀHANGA Under Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Whangape Lot 65B Sec 2A Block I WAENGA I A Between DICK RATU,...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 208 Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Farrimond interlocutory [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...Zhou v Chief Executive of the Department of Labour [2011] NZEmpC 36. 4 At [76]. 5 The Vice-Chancellor of Massey University v Wrigley [2010] NZEmpC 52 at [17]-[19]. 6 Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1986] 1 All ER 617, at 626; M v Independent Newspapers [1992] 1 ERNZ 202 (HC) at 208-214; Nedax Systems Ltd v Waterford Security New Zealand Ltd [1994] 1 ERNZ 491 at 505; Associated Property Holdings NZ Ltd v Smith, HC Auckland CP 426-SW99, 3 February 2000 at [28]-[34]. 9....

4. Auckland Standards Committee v Hylan [2014] NZLCDT 31 [pdf, 95 KB]

   REDACTED VERSION NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZLCDT 31 LCDT 018/13 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE No. 5 Applicant AND HEVAL HYLAN Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr A Lamont Mr C Rickit Mr P Shaw Mr S Walker HEARING at Auckland DATE OF HEARING 1 April 2014 COUNSEL Mr C Morris for S...

5. Auckland Standards Committees 2 and 3 v Mason [2019] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 89 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2019] NZLCDT 5 LCDT 007/18 UNDER The Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEES 2 AND 3 Applicant AND NIGEL DAVID MASON Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS Ms A Callinan Mr W Chapman Ms C Rowe Mr W Smith DATE OF HEARING 19 February 2019 HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre, Auckland DATE OF DECISION 8...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 183 Port Otago Ltd v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 6.3 MB]

   BEFORETHEEN~RONMENTCOURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 182 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Act ROYAL FOREST & BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV-201S-AKL-129) NGATI MAKINO HERITAGE TRUST (ENV-201S-AKL-140) NGATI RANGINUI IWI INCORPORATED SOCIETY (ENV-201S-AKL-141) Appellants BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL

7. Inaia Tonu Nei - Hui Maori - Combined version PDF [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   Kua tae te wā Te Pūrongo a Te Hui Māori HŌNGONGOI 2019 Hei whakarāpopoto tēnei pūrongo i ngā kōrero i puta rā i te hui e kīa nei Ināia Tonu Nei – Hui Māori i tū i Rotorua mai i te 5–7 Āperira 2019. Nā tētahi tira iti i tuhi ngā kōrero o te Hui Māori, nāna hoki i kohi ngā whakaaro mai i ngā whakawhitinga kōrero, i ngā kauwhau me ngā mahi ā-rōpū. Te whāinga o tēnei pukapuka he hopu i ngā kōrero i puta i te Hui, me te tāpae horopaki hoki mō te pūta

8. [2011] NZEmpC 129 Patel v Pegasus Stations Ltd [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...this Court challenging the whole of the determination 1 of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) dated 19 May 2011. In its determination, the Authority found that Mr Patel’s dismissal from his employment at Mobil’s Royal Heights Service Station on 21 June 2010 had been justified. He had been dismissed for failing to follow correctly the procedure prescribed for handling a fuel discount scheme known as the Under Canopy Discount Programme during his shift on 8 May...

9. RB v CG LCRO 117/2013 (30 June 2014) [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...received others after Ms CG had completed her work. [6] On the basis that Ms CG’s advice to her on the protection order was deficient, Ms RB refused to pay Ms CG’s outstanding fee of $7,742.37, and on 14 December 2011, she complained to the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS). Standards Committee decision [7] After receiving notice of the complaint against her, Ms CG requested information from the police, believing she was still acting for Ms RB. Ms RB says after she received ad...

10. Hikaka v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 416) & M Lovell, S Lovell, O'Shea and Lovell Real Estate Limited [2018] NZREADT 72 [pdf, 197 KB]

    ...[14] The Committee stated that it was incumbent on Mr Hikaka to establish that the Lovells had failed to disclose weathertightness issues with the property to subsequent purchasers including the Fellows. It recorded that Mr and Mrs Fellows had left New Zealand after selling the house, and could not be contacted. Accordingly, the Committee did not have a statement from them as to what disclosure was made to them. The Committee also recorded that Mr Hikaka had not presented any...