Search Results

1. Welsh — Part Awarua Block (2009) 7 Taitokerau Appellate MB 122 (7 APWH 122) [pdf, 77 KB]

   STANLEY WELSH MAC A20080003461 9 June 2009 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 7 TAIKOKERAU APPELLATE MB 122 APPEAL 2008/67 A20080003461 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Part Awarua block - An appeal against a decision of the Maori Land Court dated 20 May 2008. STANLEY WELSH Appellant Coram: Judge P J Savage Judge L R Harvey Judge S R Clark Appearances: Mr S Welsh Mr S Graham He...

2. D v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2022] CEIT-2020-0014 [pdf, 619 KB]

   1 IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0014-2020 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN WD Applicant AND IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Respondent Hearing: 18, 19 and 25 March 2021 and 3, 4 and 18 June 2021 Further submissions 23 August 2022 Date: 21 December 2022 Representatives: Peter Woods and Kate Vilsbaek for the Applicant

3. Federated Farmers of New Zealand.pdf [pdf, 425 KB]

   ...September 2020 169 London Street PO Box 447 Hamilton Telephone: 07 858 0815 Email: ljeffries@fedfarm.org.nz Solicitor acting: Nikki Edwards / Laura Jeffries To: The Registrar Environment Court Auckland Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc (“Federated Farmers”) wishes to be a party to the following proceedings: Fonterra Limited v Waikato Regional Council ENV-2020-AKL-000084 Federated Farmers made a submission about the subject matter of the proceed...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 155 Tasman District Council v G Baigent [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...some elements of wetland habitat. The presence of the weed species of gorse and blackberry are the key elements here as they will not colonise an area subject to constant saturation. [19] Messrs Baigent and Lurling both filed further affidavits addressing aspects of the Fryer affidavit. It is not necessary for me to make any reference to those at this stage. [20] In light of that background information, I turn to what appears to me to be the two fundamental questions in this case:...

5. VM v ND & HB LCRO 249/2012 (30 November 2015) [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...2006. b. It ordered Mr ND to pay Mr VM the sum of $3,000 pursuant to s 156(1)(d) of the Act by way of compensation for the stress and anxiety caused to Mr VM. 2 c. It ordered Mr ND to pay costs of $1,500 pursuant to s 156(1)(n) to the New Zealand Law Society. [4] The Committee determined to take no further action in respect of the complaint against Ms HB. [5] Mr VM has applied for a review of the Standards Committee’s determination, in particular, seeking further co...

6. Budapest-Convention-and-Related-Matters-Legislation-Amendment-Bill_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 545 KB]

   ...Introduction Proposal 1 This paper seeks approval for the introduction of the Budapest Convention and Related Matters Legislation Amendment Bill. Executive Summary 2 The Budapest Convention and Related Matters Legislation Amendment Bill makes changes to New Zealand’s domestic legislation to give effect to the provisions of the Budapest Convention. 3 The Budapest Convention is an international treaty aimed at combatting cybercrime through greater international cooperation. A...

7. Dovey v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for mental injury) [2025] NZACC 49 (25 March 2025) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...increased cannabis use. Considering the concussion versus the mental health presentation, my impression is that the mental health issues are more significant than his concussion. ... [10] On 12 January 2021, Mr Dovey was discharged from Concussion Services with a note that “no further requirements for therapy supports identified at this time”. [11] On 29 January 2021, Mr Dovey was assessed by Dr Sheila Doshi, Psychiatrist, who reported: Gary is a 52 year old man who has devel...

8. [2024] NZACC 141 NF v ACC (Impairment Assessment, Independence Allowance) (21 August 2024) [pdf, 357 KB]

   NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF APPELLANT PROHIBITED BY S 160 (1), (2) AND (3) OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001. SEE https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2001/0049/latest/DLM101854.html IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 141 ACAR 041/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN NF Appe...

9. [2021] NZEnvC 118 Drach v Tasman District Council [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...noticed a "wee bit'' more traffic and more parking on the road. He accepted that 15 16 17 NOE, p 64, 117-29. NOE, p '35, 1 5-27. NOE, p 41, 11 - p 42, 16. 12 he did not lmow whether the cars he noticed were from the new dwelling built following that subdivision. I.;y11ette Shir!v, [37] :tvis Shirley explained how the pre-purchase legal advice she and her husband got was that the inability to subdivide could change with time. \'v'hile they...

10. Quin v REAA & Knaptondocx [2012] NZREADT 13 [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...licensee did not properly explain the problems with the accessway; [d] The licensee failed to mention any issue with the accessway in an email dated 16 November 2009 which described various characteristics of the property; [e] The licensee knew that there was a problem with the property but did not understand its extent. The information given to her about the accessway ought to have put her on enquiry, and she ought to have taken steps to find out. It was not for the complaina...