Search Results

Search results for new address for service .

8017 items matching your search terms

Search Disputes Tribunal only.

  1. Hawkes Bay Standards Committee v Heaphy [2014] NZLCDT 61 [pdf, 343 KB]

    NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZLCDT 61 LCDT 037/13 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN HAWKE’S BAY STANDARDS COMMITTEE Applicant AND JONATHAN CHARLES HEAPHY Of Havelock North, Lawyer CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr W Chapman Mr M Gough Mr A Marshall Mr P Shaw HEARING at Hastings DATE OF HEARING 16, 17, 18 September 2014 APPEARA...

  2. Lochead-MacMillan v AMI Insurance [2012] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 109 KB]

    ...VFR. [7] On 5 March 2010 Ms Shepperson wrote to Mr and Mrs Lochead-MacMillan to the effect that the investigations had been completed and that the claim had been formally accepted. The information requests under the Privacy Act were not, however, addressed by Ms Shepperson. In her evidence to the Tribunal she said that the reason was that she (Ms Shepperson) was of the view that acceptance of the insurance claims would dispose of the need for the information to be provided. This assu...

  3. [2021] NZEmpC 146 Gafiatullina v Propellerhead Ltd [pdf, 394 KB]

    LINARA GAFIATULLINA v PROPELLERHEAD LIMITED [2021] NZEmpC 146 [8 September 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 146 EMPC 199/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN LINARA GAFIATULLINA Plaintiff AND PROPELLERHEAD LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 10–12 and 19 February 2021 (Heard at...

  4. [2024] NZREADT 40 - CAC v Tafilipepe (25 October 2024) [pdf, 367 KB]

    ...words by way of qualification to the ordinary meaning of the word disgraceful make it clear that the test of disgraceful conduct is an objective one for this Tribunal to assess. See Blake v Preliminary Proceedings Committee of the Medical Council of New Zealand, [1997] 1 NZLR 71. [57] The ‘reasonable person’ is a legal fiction of common law representing an objective standard against which individual conduct can be measured but under s 73(a) that reasonable person is qualified to b...

  5. Morgan v CAC 20003 [2014] NZREADT 14 [pdf, 209 KB]

    ...GST for his services as 'purchaser's agent'. The fee was duly paid. [17] The sale of the Property to Mr Denize went unconditional on 13 July 2013 (and subsequently settled on 20 July 2013). On the same date, Mr Shallue signed a new sale and purchase agreement with Mr McIntyre for the remainder of the property (i.e. excluding “the Property” which had been sold to Mr Denize) which had been subject to the 2010 McIntyre Agreement. The Specific Charges [18] We...

  6. Proactive release - New Compensation Guidelines for Wrongful Conviction and Imprisonment [pdf, 756 KB]

    © Crown Copyright, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Hon Andrew Little Minister of Justice Proactive release – New Compensation Guidelines for Wrongful Conviction and Imprisonment Date of issue: 20 August 2020 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. No. Document Comments 1 New Compensation Guidelines for Wrongful Conviction and Imprisonment Cabinet Paper Office of the Minister o...

  7. Justice Sector seriousness score (2016 update): FAQs [pdf, 585 KB]

    ...quite simply, by treating one day of a home detention sentence as equivalent to one day of a prison sentence. Further details of the calculations, including formulae, are in the Appendix. 1 New South Wales did recently create a single seriousness scale encompassing 15 different types of punishment (MacKinnell, Poletti, & Holmes, 2010). But this did not establish equivalence values between different types of sentence. That...

  8. [2024] NZEmpC 6 C3 Ltd v O’Brien [pdf, 250 KB]

    ...This judgment resolves that challenge. [2] The Authority’s determination sets out the background facts in some detail.2 The parties have filed further affidavit evidence with the Court. The key facts follow: (a) C3 Ltd provides stevedoring services at the Auckland port operated by Ports of Auckland Ltd (POAL). Like any port, the workplace is 1 O’Brien v C3 Ltd [2023] NZERA 612 (Member Larmer). 2 At [8]–[52]. considered a high-risk working environment from...

  9. [2024] NZSSAA 10 (5 September 2024) [pdf, 340 KB]

    ...statutory deeming provision does not alter the tax liability. In that regard a benefit and ACC weekly compensation are the same in terms of the tax consequences. [27] As a general policy where benefits are income tested those benefits are taxable in New Zealand.12 However, the various statutory provisions have specific references to the tax status of various benefits. New Zealand Superannuation is a notable example of a benefit that is not income tested but is taxable. Some supple...

  10. Transcript of PC8 Urban Provisions - Complete [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-128 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 8 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 21 March 2022 held in Courtroom 13 Court: Envir