Search Results

1. National Standards Committee 1 v Name Suppressed [2021] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...But even in the absence of that provision, the Tribunal would be required to observe the principles of natural justice. It will inevitably be unnecessary to engage in a natural justice analysis at this stage because, for the reasons I have already addressed, it is appropriate to deal with natural justice considerations first in cases where they arise. [108] … The Tribunal must provide reasons for its decision to exercise its discretion to admit otherwise inadmissible evidence. (Empha...

2. KQ & WQ v EN & MN [2021] NZDT 1439 (27 April 2021) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...up such an offer and that he would never have expended funds on the property unless he was 100% confident that the purchase would proceed. 16. The arborist work was carried out on 24, 25 and 29 February 2020 and KQ was invoiced $4,140 for the service. (Payment for the arborist works may support that it was they who sought the change to the scheme plan for the new driveway.) 17. Not long thereafter EN and MN say that KQ advised them that he and WQ no longer believed that they were...

3. JK v SY LCRO 271/2013 (9 September 2016) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...settle by withdrawing its claim against Mr [JK] and Ms [PQ] and paying some of their costs. A notice of discontinuance was filed on [Day Month] 2010. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [27] Mr [JK] lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service on 20 July 2012 which was amplified in subsequent correspondence. The substance of Mr [JK’s] complaint was that: (a) Mr [SY] drafted and filed the statement of claim which alleged that Mr [JK] ha...

4. Matenga v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly compensation) [2024] NZACC 140 [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...considered backdated entitlement to weekly compensation for the period where deemed cover existed for kidney stones. We wrote to you on 25 October 2022 about your determined periods of incapacity (due to the kidney stones). ACC has since received new information and we have decided to revoke and replace this decision with the following. … ACC therefore accepts that you likely had incapacity because of kidney stones from 19 January 2017 (date of accident). However, you do not hold...

5. Lewis & Anor as Trustees of the Warren and Bronwyn Lewis Family Trust v Auckland City Council [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...AND May Plastering Limited Fifth Respondent – Now Struck Out AND Plastering.co.nz Limited Sixth Respondent – Now Struck Out AND Michael Gregory May Seventh Respondent – Now Struck Out AND Premier Roofing Products New Zealand Limited Eighth Respondent AND Michael John McNie Ninth Respondent AND Riasat Ali Tenth Respondent AND Vero Liability Insurance Limited Eleventh Respondent – Now Struck Out AND Aluminium System...

6. [2014] NZEmpC 98 Narayan v Telecom NZ Ltd [pdf, 129 KB]

   MADHUKAR SHYAM NARAYAN v TELECOM NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 98 [18 June 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2014] NZEmpC 98 ARC 32/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MADHUKAR SHYAM NARAYAN Plaintiff AND TELECOM NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 19-20 February and 15 May 2014 Appearances: M Narayan, plaintiff in pers...

7. 4. Roebeck affidavit (with exhibits) [pdf, 7 MB]

   AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID IAN ROEBECK FOR THE NGATI PAOA TRUST BOARD IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING AN APPEAL 31 AUGUST 2018 Counsel instructed: J D K Gardner-Hopkins Phone: 04 889 2776 james@jghbarrister.com PO Box 25-160 WELLINGTON Solicitors on the record: Todd Greenwood Greenwood Law Limited Phone: 021 082 43911 todd@greenwoodlaw.co.nz PO Box 642 WAIHEKE ISLAND 1840 IN THE HIGH COURT CIV-2018-AKL-000

8. Transcript - PC8 - Primary Sector Provisions - 8-9 November 2021 [pdf, 853 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-128 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 8 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: Monday 8 November 2021 in Dunedin Court: Environment Judge P A S

9. 2021-04-23 TAs - MOC - submissions [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...phil.page@gallawaycookallan.co.nz Email: bridget.irving@gallawaycookallan.co.nz 1 RAC-098608-70-36-V1 SUBMISSIONS OF COUNSEL May it please the Court: PRINCIPLES OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION Purposive Approach 1. Statutory interpretation in New Zealand requires first and foremost a purposive approach. Section 5 of the Interpretation Act 1999 directs: (1) The meaning of an enactment must be ascertained from its text and in the light of its purpose. (2) The matters t...

10. 2021-04-23 TAs - MOC - submissions 2 [pdf, 323 KB]

    ...phil.page@gallawaycookallan.co.nz Email: bridget.irving@gallawaycookallan.co.nz 1 RAC-098608-70-36-V1 SUBMISSIONS OF COUNSEL May it please the Court: PRINCIPLES OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION Purposive Approach 1. Statutory interpretation in New Zealand requires first and foremost a purposive approach. Section 5 of the Interpretation Act 1999 directs: (1) The meaning of an enactment must be ascertained from its text and in the light of its purpose. (2) The matters t...