Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 175 Shaw v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...reasonable and acceptable, and compare favourably against all reasonable alternatives considered. … (iii) The recommendations from the ecological assessment with regards to ecological mitigation and restoration and bat management have been addressed in the conditions applied to the designation. (iv) Costs were considered as part of option development and selection of the preferred option. The Southern Links cost estimates were independently peer reviewed using a parallel estimate...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 8 Gazeley v Oceania Group (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...agreements with district health boards. In the case of Woodlands, the agreement is with the Nelson Marlborough District Health Board. Under the agreement, Oceania is obliged to comply with a detailed specification of the nature and quality of services provided. [3] In July 2009, Mrs Gazeley was appointed as Facilities Manager of Woodlands. That was the most senior role at Woodlands and Mrs Gazeley had responsibility for all aspects of the operation. On 30 September 2011, Mrs Gaz...

3. [2014] NZEmpC 183 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Ltd interlocutory [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...Micron Security Products Limited 30-32 Crummer Road, PO Box 78-006, Grey Lynn, Auckland 1245, Managing Director”. I interpret that entituling to be one which nominated Mr Weston personally as respondent. The reference to the business and its address was to identify where Mr Weston might be found for the purposes of service and as a description of his occupation. Subsequent pleadings filed by both Ms Scarborough and Mr Weston (the respondent was not represented in the Authorit...

4. SW v UH LCRO 170/2014 (5 February 2016) [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...suggestion that Ms UH was in the possession of information which would have put her on notice that the veracity of her client’s affidavit, or the attachment to that affidavit, demanded careful scrutiny. [41] The letter of which Mr SW complains addressed matters directly relevant to the Family Court proceedings which were confidential. The extent to which the content of the letter was accurate and relevant was a matter to be determined by the Court. Ms CR signed the letter and in thos...

5. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...evidence came after the claimant had called expert evidence in rebuttal, the claimant says that it was put to unnecessary cost. iv) Unsuccessful technical points 21. The claimant accepts that the Council may have been entitled to raise new arguments as the hearing progressed and after the hearing was completed. However the claimant notes that those arguments were generally unsuccessful and thereby caused them unnecessary costs in responding to them. vi) Statutory sche...

6. Hunter v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2025] NZACC 28 (18 February 2025) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...with the review adopting 31 March 2014 as to the 8 correct tax year for determining Mr Hunter’s earnings. Nevertheless, no appeal was lodged by or on behalf of Mr Hunter. (g) On 25 June 2024, Dr Bryant, on behalf of Mr Hunter, requested a new decision from the Corporation relating to his earnings-related compensation based on his date of incapacity being later than his accident date. Still, no appeal was lodged by Mr Hunter or his representative Dr Bryant. (h) On 2 Octo...

7. EMPC Memorial sitting John Haigh QC [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...compassion and genuine concern for me. That continued well beyond his period as my counsel. Those of us who practised with John were lucky. He was a fine man and an excellent lawyer.” 3 We will begin this afternoon with a number of addresses from the Bar and then from the Bench. After the hearing concludes, everyone is very cordially invited to share our memories of John more informally in the Rydges Hotel next door to this building in Federal Street. I acknowledge...

8. 14.-Ainsley-McLeod-Conditions.pdf [pdf, 2 MB]

   Barristers and Solicitors Wellington Solicitors Acting: David Randal / Thaddeus Ryan / Frances Wedde Email: david.randal@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64-4-499 4242 Fax 64-4-499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6140 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-Ā-TARA ROHE ENV-2020-WLG-00014 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER OF a notice of motion under section 87G of the Act seeki

9. Gollins v CAC 20002 [2014] NZREADT 52 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...date of the verbal agreement (apparently 9 February 2010) and that he, Mr O’Styke, would sign it. The agreement was signed by Mr O’Styke on 21 September 2012. [33] Mr Gollins responded to Messrs Lash and Price on 24 September 2012 by email addressing the issues raised about the services he had provided to Foodstuffs. However, Mr Gollins also attached a copy of the agency agreement and stated that it had been signed on 9 February 2010. [34] The next day, Mr Gollins sought advice f...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 39 Metropolitan Glass & Glazing Ltd v Labour Inspector [pdf, 283 KB]

    ...nominated 21 December as its closedown date each year (the nominated date). From the nominated date, via its payroll system, Metropolitan Glass provides an “annual holiday entitlement” to each of its employees who have less than one year’s service (the affected employees) proportionate to the amount of time the affected employee has been working for Metropolitan Glass (entitled annual holidays). [42] The effect of this is that, in Metropolitan Glass’s payroll system, each o...