Search Results

1. [2019] NZEmpC 132 Chief Executive of Manukau Institute of Technology v Zivaljevic [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...January 2018. He addresses the points made by Mr Zivaljevic, including saying, in relation to redeployment: As these roles were significantly different to the previous roles under the faculty structures they were considered contestable. The State Services Act requires us to undertake an open and contestable process for all new roles, meaning that redeployment focuses on working with impacted staff to apply for new roles that are available. [17] On 26 January 2018, Mr Zivaljevi...

2. LCRO 68/2019 NI v RC and OD (28 February 2020) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...to review the Standards Committee determination.) [23] The final paragraph of Miss NI’s general comments on review read: “… Mr RC did not follow my instructions, furthermore I could never get ahold [sic] of him and he then withdrew his services right at pivotal point and lost my case”. [24] The outcome Miss NI seeks is to have the “fees wiped” and apologies from both Mr RC and Mr OD. Review [25] A hearing took place in Auckland on 4 February 2020 with Miss NI who was...

3. LCRO 188/2018 KB v WQ and LT (22 January 2021) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...investors". 2 [3] The development offered investors an opportunity to purchase first right of refusal agreements (“FRR agreements”) in respect to units that were to be constructed. [4] The development was being marketed both within New Zealand and, it appears, extensively offshore. [5] Mr WQ and Mr LT were partners in the firm Q Law Limited (QLL). [6] In around April 2011, QLL was instructed to act for AHVL. [7] QLL was instructed to review the FRR agreements, and to...

4. Waitangi Tribunal Guide to Practice 2023 [pdf, 900 KB]

   ...54 Claimants intending to participate 54 Exploratory scoping report 55 Starting new unlisted kaupapa inquiries 55 An inclusive approach to claimant participation 56 ‘Nationally significant claim issues’

5. Rec-Recap-2023-Q1-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 889 KB]

   ...of a tablet is active, it would have taken about 50mg of pure powder to have the same effect as 100 tablets. The Police National Drug Intelligence Bureau reported that etizolam is a novel benzodiazepine which is not approved for medical use in New Zealand, and is much stronger than any benzodiazepines legally prescribed here. It has been found in New Zealand in powder, tablet, liquid and paper blotter form. It is cheap when ordered online and highly potent. It is often sold as counter...

6. Director of Proceedings v IDEA Services Ltd [2022] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 690 KB]

   ...rights under the Health and Disability Commissioner (Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights) Regulations 1996 (“the Code”) and in accordance with s 45(2)(f) of the Act, referred the defendant to the plaintiff. 1 IHC New Zealand Incorporated is the ultimate holding group of IDEA Services and owns 100% of its shares. 3 THE PARTIES The defendant 7. The defendant is New Zealand’s largest provider of services to people with intellectual disabil...

7. LCRO 7/2024 SO v EJ and QJ (30 July 2025) [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...for Probate and be appointed as the executor of Mr HJ’s will. 1 Last will and testament of HJ (30 July 2007) at paragraph 2(a). 2 [3] Mrs EJ and Ms QJ were the beneficiaries of Mr HJ’s estate. [4] At the time of Mr HJ’s death, New Zealand was in a COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. [5] The Application for Probate was filed on 24 August 2020. After difficulties with the form and content of the application and supporting affidavit (which Mr SO describes as necessitating ...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 13 Edwards v Recreational Services Ltd [pdf, 206 KB]

   THOMAS EDWARDS v RECREATIONAL SERVICES LIMITED [2021] NZEmpC 13 [16 February 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 13 EMPC 262/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for security for costs BETWEEN THOMAS EDWARDS Plaintiff AND RECREATIONAL SERVICES LIMITE...

9. LCRO 176/2019 LJ v RY and PG (7 July 2020) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...inaccurate. 4 5. The quality of the job [was] poor. The job seem very rushed out. 6. Many documents were filed after the deadline and did not give [him] enough time to respon[d]. [19] The outcome sought by Mr LJ was “compensation [for] the poor services provided and wrong advice”. The Standards Committee determination [20] The Standards Committee identified two issues to be addressed:9 a. Whether the advice given by either or both Mr RY and Mr PG fell short of the sta...

10. 04042025-Financial-Service-Providers-Registration-and-Dispute-Resolution-Amendment-Bill.pdf [pdf, 200 KB]

    LEGAL ADVICE LPA 01 01 24 25 February 2025 Hon Judith Collins KC, Attorney-General Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Financial Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Amendment Bill Purpose 1. We have considered whether the Financial Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Amendment Bill (the Bill) is consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the Bill of Rights Act). 2...