Search Results

1. [2008] NZEmpC AC 39/08 Prins & Anor v Tirohanga Group Ltd (formerly Tirohanga Rural Estates Ltd) [pdf, 26 KB]

   ...claim indemnity costs and disbursements in the Authority of $44,453.59. This consists of solicitor-client legal costs of $38, 837.50, GST on these of $4,854.69, and Authority filing and hearing fees totalling $520.00. Other disbursements include New Zealand Police forensic document examination service fees and the usual claims for photocopying, tolls and stationery. Mr Drake makes the point that he appeared without a junior in the Authority although several staff solicitors from th...

2. Morunga - Whirinaki 3B8B1 (2008) 126 Whangarei MB 36 (126 WH 36) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...Ihe cllrrent lille this property is 'lilder we may not be able 10 assist YOIl with any borrowings until it is transferred. if YOIl reqllire fllrther infonl/alion please do not hesitate to contact me. " [l0] Unfortunately, neither letter addressed whether the Maori freehold status of the land meant it was unable to be used as mortgage security. The letter fi·OJll Wizard Home Loans was patently incorrect as the land does have fi·eehold title (and a certificate of title). I...

3. Potatoes NZ Incorporated.PDF [PDF, 910 KB]

   ...below. 11) PNZ agrees to participate in mediation or other alternative dispute resolution of the proceedings. Chris Keenan, authorised to sign on behalf Chris Claridge, Chief Executive, Potatoes NZ Incorporated 29 September 2020 Address for service of person wishing to be a party: Postal PO Box 10232 The Terrace Wellington 6143 Physical L4, Co-Operative Bank House 20 Ballance Street Wellington 6011 Telephone: P: 0800 399 674 M: 027 206 5390 Fax/email: ac...

4. Moore - Waitara East Section 81 B [2018] Chief Judge's MB 842 (2018 CJ 842) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...Kingi Te Rangitake and included “loyalist” Māori who 1 67 Taranaki MB 165 (67 TAR 165). 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 844 had no interest in the block but were included as a reward for their service to the Crown. (b) A freehold order issued by the Native Land Court on 21 February 1916 which declared 11 people as owners of the block. The applicant claims that this “further diluted” the interests of the whānau and hapū o...

5. [2022] NZREADT 3 - IE v REAA (15 March 2022) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...inconsequential matter and did not need to be pursued. Her reasons were set out in the letter. [8] The applicant disputed the manager’s decision. [9] On 1 June 2021, the manager sent an email to the applicant stating that he had not provided any new information requiring reconsideration of the determination. The complaint file remained closed and the Authority would not be taking any further action. [10] The applicant continued to dispute the decision. [11] On 9 June 2...

6. CW & NK v TX [2023] NZDT 411 (5 July 2023) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...however accepted practice within both real estate and legal professions that clauses within this type of agreement may, and are, routinely amended to suit the circumstances of the parties. That is, TX had the opportunity either himself, or through the services of his lawyer and/or real estate agent, to modify his obligations under the Agreement so that his actions would comply. While it may be unfortunate if TX did not know about his obligations under clause 3.4, I am required to make my d...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 263 North Canterbury Fish & Game Council v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...Council’) and the Minister for the Environment (‘Minister’) regarding the administration of the Conservation Order. Several parties joined the application for declarations as interested parties under s274 RMA. [2] David Williams, a reporter for Newsroom, has filed an application requesting access to:1 Any minutes, applications, requests for amendments, memoranda, affidavits, plus other relevant filings or notices from the court, Environmental Defence Society, North Canterbu...

8. [2021] NZACC 5 - Andrews v ACC (12 January 2021) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...convincing history of concussion and he was sent to a concussion clinic via ACC. [6] A rehabilitation plan and a return to work plan were prepared. [7] On 20 April 2012 an appointment was made for the appellant for a consultation with the Concussion Service. [8] On 23 April 2012 the appellant’s GP provided a further medical certificate recording that the appellant’s capacity to return to normal work was now 3 hours per day, 5 days per week for 2 weeks and that this would incre...

9. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 WML evidence chief Philip Treloar [pdf, 6.9 MB]

   ...wave modelling tasks throughout Australasia and south-east Asia, including those at Wellington (ocean outfall), proposed Westport coal terminal and the Rosedale ocean outfall project in Auckland. Marina studies include those at Tauranga Bridge (New Zealand) and the Cruising Yacht Club, Royal Victoria Yacht Club and Southport Yacht Club (Australia), Daru, Frieda River (PNG). Other coastal investigation sites (Australia) include the Gold Coast, Tweed Heads, Moreton Bay, Hay Point/D...

10. Henare v Maori Trustee - Parengarenga 3G costs [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 540 (2012 APPEAL 540) [pdf, 215 KB]

    ...appellant is entitled to an award of costs, whether such an award is made is still to be decided. Costs awarded for work completed on a pro bono basis [25] The Māori Trustee does not take issue with the fact that counsel for the appellant’s services were provided on a pro bono basis. [26] Taipari v Hauraki Māori Trust Board is authority that costs could be awarded in favour of a successful party, despite the work having been completed on a pro bono basis. 4