8018 items matching your search terms
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY UNDER Resource Management Act 1991 (Act). IN THE MATTER OF The Water Permits Plan Change - Plan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF CHRISTINA ELYSE BRIGHT ON BEHALF OF LANDPRO LIMITED 5 February 2021
177 Waiāriki MB 170 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20160006430 UNDER Sections 19 and 231, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Matangareka 3B Block BETWEEN EDWARD MATCHITT Applicant AND RICHARD JOHN BUTLER, THOMAS HENRY BUTLER, STEWART JAMES BUTLER, TUIHANA POOK, MAURA HIONA ROBSON AND MOANA PAREHUIA WAITITI AS TRUSTEES OF MATANGAREKA 3B TRUST Respondents Hearing: 18 November 2016, 1...
...chance of a re-trial, and on 30 August 2019, he advised that the information might be needed in unspecified “other matters and likely in future other matters”. [10] The Tribunal received submissions from Mr Woodhouse on behalf of Mr Singh, and New Zealand counsel instructed by Mr Edmondson on behalf of Mr Govindarajan (Ms Badenhorst). In Ms Badenhorst’s submissions, reference was made to the information being sought for “mirror defamation proceedings” “recently stirred...
...everything appropriate to face up to his culpability for his offending and he has tried to take positive steps to put this behind him. He had made no attempt to hide his conviction. He submitted that there had been no suggestion by the Probation Service or anyone that alcohol was an ongoing issue for him and/or any issues about sexual conduct. Mr McDonald submitted that Mr G was a young man at the time of the offence. He further submitted that the Tribunal must be ‘forward thinking...
...Standards Committee also concluded that it was proper that publication of its decision was necessary or desirable in the public interest. That decision was, however, suspended pending this application for review. The question was not directly addressed by either party to this hearing and as such I will not consider it further. Background [4] Mr Newbury retained Mr Windsor in April 2008 after advertising for the assistance of a junior barrister. At a meeting on 17 April Mr Newb...
...Dwelling in Māori Land Court [17] In determining the valuation for the dwelling the lower Court heard evidence from the appellant as to the condition of the dwelling at the time of his occupation. Although it was barely habitable it had essential services sufficient to allow him to occupy the land. The appellant put the value at $1,500.00 prior to his effecting improvements. [18] A Valuation New Zealand report prepared in 1993 put the value of the dwelling at $19,000.00 being the...
...for the Trailer to be returned, but this was refused. The items discussed at that meeting were recorded in an email from T Ltd to C Ltd dated 25 March 2020., including that UT asked for the invoice for the Trailer to be re-issued in the name of his new company, UT Ltd. On 25 May 2020, T Ltd reissued the invoice for the Trailer to UT Ltd. On 28 May 2020, UT Ltd paid $6,000.00 to T Ltd for the Trailer. No further payments were made by UT Ltd for the Trailer. 5. T Ltd remained the registe...
...correct any factual error before we issued a final decision. Both parties filed submissions which we considered. We now issue our final decision. Background [3] The appellant’s situation is unusual. She has a Kāinga Ora (formerly Housing New Zealand) house in Nelson but works in Wellington during the week. She incurs weekly costs of travel to and from Wellington ($200), board in Wellington ($115), and travel to work on public transport ($53). It is these costs which she cla...
...discovering the damage. [26] I am not persuaded NC was required to meet SM on site simply because SM demanded it. The damage was discovered shortly before the Christmas break and the business closed down until the end of January 2022. Given the way New Zealanders’ holiday I do not find this unreasonable. Further that NC would not admit liability is not evidence of liability simply evidence that NC does not accept liability. Neither do I find it evidence of guilt that NC suggested othe...
...related products in the Australasian market. The products and services offered by a business called Mitre 10 MEGA Queenstown ("Mitre 10") and Bunnings are similar'. Mitre 10 and Bunnings are two of the dominant trade suppliers in the New Zealand market. [10] An important issue is the relationship between the section 274 party HJSL and the owner of Mitre 10. To understand that I will set out the (agreed) inter-relationships in the H&J Smith Group. The H&J Smi...