Search Results

Search results for new address for service .

8018 items matching your search terms

Search Disputes Tribunal only.

  1. Lee v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2023] NZACC 176 [pdf, 352 KB]

    ...June 2023, which in large part described his exposure to trichloroethane following his employment with New Zealand Post Office as an apprentice electrician, a role commencing on 21 February 1979. [21] In the course of repairing and servicing electrical machinery, he used trichloroethane daily. He said: 11. A cleaning area with a bench was set up in the workshop. A green plastic bin used for cleaning parts sat on the bench. The trichloroethane was poured from a can i...

  2. [2024] NZEnvC 156 New Zealand Steel Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 830 KB]

    NZ Steel Ltd v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 156 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND STEEL LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-000042) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Alternate Environment Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case event: Joint memorandum and amended consent memorandum date...

  3. Rata - Whataarakai No 1 Roadway and Lot 1 Deposited Plan 374627 [2020] Chief Judge's MB 74 (2020 CJ 74) [pdf, 432 KB]

    ...complying with the conditions set out at the decision recorded at paragraph [28] of the decision made at 5 Tākitimu MB 239 – 247 (12 November 2010). The application was then referred to the Registrar for report and inquiry, and advised to engage the services of John Neverman of McCaw Lewis to provide advice of how to resolve the matter so that Mr Setter, could proceed with his subdivision, while ensuring a roadway in the new position along the southern boundary line will give acces...

  4. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 7.2 MB]

    t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 1 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

  5. LCRO 240/2016 HM v NL (28 November 2018) [pdf, 255 KB]

    ...cancel the purchase agreement. [16] Ms NL cancelled the agreement and endeavoured to secure a refund of the deposit. The vendors would not agree to refund the deposit. Complaint [17] In a complaint dated 25 August 2015, Mr HM complained to the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (Complaints Service) about Ms NL’s conduct. He said: (a) On 26 February 2015, he spoke to Ms NL about purchasing a house property from Mr A and Mr A’s partner. He made it clear that his nam...

  6. Harris & Ors as Trustees of the Estuary Trust v Veltman [2010] NZWHT Auckland 19 [pdf, 231 KB]

    ...Trust are the claimants in this claim. The property however was purchased as a home for Mr and Mrs Harris and remained their home until they moved out to allow the deconstruction and reconstruction work to take place. They will move into the new home being built on its completion. [10] Mr and Mrs Harris did not obtain a builder’s report or carry out any technical pre-purchase inspection before they bought the property. They visited the home on a number of occasions and...

  7. LCRO 73/2019 LM v NO (27 July 2020) [pdf, 224 KB]

    ...proceedings in the High Court. No counsel was noted as having been instructed to act. By September 2018, counsel (Mr UV QC) was instructed to act for S in those proceedings. The complaint [19] Ms LM lodged a complaint against Mr NO with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (the Complaints Service) on 15 October 2018. [20] The essence of Ms LM’s complaint was that Mr NO was acting for two clients (PQ and S) in one matter (issues relevant to relationship property) when...

  8. Hall v Opepe Farm Trust - Opepe Farm Trust (2014) 104 Waiariki MB 54 (104 WAR 54) [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...personally, nor did the interim trustees. In fact, at no time did the interim trustees object to the payment of the applicant’s costs by the Trust. [42] Ms Opai further argued that the costs issues which the Court indicated remained to be addressed, only related to the indemnification of the respondents’ costs. As the second respondents did not seek the payment of their costs from the Trust, there were therefore no remaining costs issues extant. [43] As to the High Court pro...

  9. OIA-119742.pdf [pdf, 2.7 MB]

    ...Thank you for your email of 25 February 2025 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), requesting information under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), about the review published by the IPCA titled ‘The Policing of public protests in New Zealand’ (the Review). Specifically, you requested: 1. All communications to and from the IPCA relating to this report, excluding anything relating to any specific complaint. Given that the IPCA has indicated it collaborated with the Mi...

  10. 2021-05-26 Transcript (up until 3.15pm on day 32) [pdf, 2.4 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 17 May 2021 in Dunedin Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Comm