Search Results

Search results for new address for service .

8018 items matching your search terms

Search Disputes Tribunal only.

  1. [2019] NZEmpC 157 Van Kleef v Alliance Group Ltd [pdf, 475 KB]

    MARIA VAN KLEEF v ALLIANCE GROUP LIMITED [2019] NZEmpC 157 [7 November 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 157 EMPC 407/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for disclosure BETWEEN MARIA VAN KLEEF Plaintiff AND ALLIANCE GROUP LIMITED Defendant...

  2. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

    ...“as Kaitiaki and trustee of the Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust (Poutama)”. Mr Hunt did not sign the notice of appeal and did not appear at the hearing of the appeal. The notice of appeal listed Mr Gibbs as the contact person under the address for service. Mr Gibbs, his sister Ms Marie Gibbs and Mr Haumoana White represented Poutama at the hearing. Mr Gibbs and Mr White provided evidence and Ms Marie Gibbs presented submissions and questioned witnesses on behalf of Poutama...

  3. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

    ...“as Kaitiaki and trustee of the Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust (Poutama)”. Mr Hunt did not sign the notice of appeal and did not appear at the hearing of the appeal. The notice of appeal listed Mr Gibbs as the contact person under the address for service. Mr Gibbs, his sister Ms Marie Gibbs and Mr Haumoana White represented Poutama at the hearing. Mr Gibbs and Mr White provided evidence and Ms Marie Gibbs presented submissions and questioned witnesses on behalf of Poutama...

  4. [2019] NZEnvC 172 The New Zealand Fairy Tern Charitable Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 13 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC \ 1 2- of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) the application for enforcement orders under s314 and s319 of the Act THE NEW ZEALAND FAIRY TERN CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2019-AKL-000137) Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge J A Smith Commissioner A C E Leijnen Commissioner M Mabin Parties: P Muir for The New Zealand Fairy Tern

  5. Reinstating-Three-Strikes-Sentencing-Law.pdf [pdf, 31 MB]

    Hon Nicole McKee Associate Minister of Justice (Three Strikes) Proactive release - Policy decisions: Reinstating three strikes sentencing law Date of issue: 11 June 2024 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 04 . Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released . Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been

  6. [2006] NZEmpC WC 10/06 Timmins v Asure New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 121 KB]

    ...which provides meat inspection functions at freezing works and employs meat inspectors who undertake post- mortem inspection of meat products. This case concerns meat inspections at the AFFCO freezing works at Imlay, Wanganui. Meat inspection services [9] Meat inspection services, previously provided by the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, was transferred to a new SOE, ASURE, in 1998. Its main function is the provision of meat inspection services to approximately 75 meat...

  7. Proactive Release - Amendments to the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 [pdf, 2.7 MB]

    Hon Kiri Allan Minister of Justice Proactive release - Amendments to the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 Date of issue: 22 March 2023 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be re leased . Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest ha

  8. LCRO 24/2023 RD v KE and PS (5 September 2023) [pdf, 329 KB]

    ...Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN RD Applicant AND KE and PS Respondents DECISION The names and identifying factors in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] In August 2021, Mr RD (RD) made a complaint to the New Zealand Law Society Lawyers Complaints Service (NZLS) about the professional conduct of Mr KE and Ms PS. [2] RD’s complaint was referred to the [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee), which inquired into it. [3] In a decis...

  9. BOAC v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 50-57 [pdf, 357 KB]

    Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2010-100-32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 and 57 BETWEEN BOAC Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND HUGHES & TUKE CONSTRUCTION LTD Second Respondent AND DAVID CHARLES TUKE Third Respondent AND DAVID B MCGLASHAN Fourth Respondent AND RRL GROUP LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND BARRY RUSSELL BROWN (Undischarged Bankrupt) Si

  10. Rogers v Stirling - Taungaure No.2 (2010) 21 Waiariki 205 (21 WAR 205) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...Partition [7] Mrs Rogers seeks to partition her entire share entitlement in the block. She owns 15 shares or 6.25% of the shares in the block and this equates to 6.0534 hectares. She was initially represented by PAYGRA Constultants Ltd, Maori Land Services. Evidence from Transit New Zealand indicating their support for the partition was provided. Transit’s consent was conditional upon its requirements for access on and off State Highway 35 being adhered to. The Opotiki Distri...