CM v RG LCRO 131/2012 (7 September 2015) [pdf, 67 KB]
...by recovering amounts they believed should be recovered from Company A. [4] The central controversy in this complaint arises from Mr RG’s conduct in relation to disclosure of a particular invoice, about which Mr CM made a complaint to the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS). 2 Standards Committee [5] Mr CM’s complaint is that Mr RG knowingly misled the Court in the “Respondent’s Event Chronology” (the chronology) which he finalised shortly before the High...