[2017] NZEnvC 205 Ahureka Trustees no 2 Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 4.5 MB]
...Mr Reaburn agreed that paragraph 268 identified a key question for determination in these proceedings.19 He went on to identify what he considered to be RMA s 104(1)(b)(v). RMA s 104(1)(b)(vi). EIC para 14.1. 12 three main issues to be addressed in the appeal: • The first being a policy related one as to whether or not what Mr Reaburn considered as being the significant urban component of the Ahuareka proposal meant that it was contrary to relevant provisions of the Unitar...