Search Results

1. [2008] NZEmpC AC 24/08 Panovski v Marine Trimmers and All Awnings 2004 Ltd [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...factory reopened on 8 January they were busy. Mr Steers said that the defendant had some two months of work in hand. He also explained that as the work was for boats, the December/January period could be the busiest for the company. All the staff knew that the factory was opening on 8 January and Mr Panovski acknowledged that he knew this as well. [30] When the week of 8 January came and Mr Panovski did not return to work, Mr Steers was unclear as to what Mr Panovski was inte...

2. Biester v Kingi - Te Ti B Part being Lot 17 DP 61631 (2025) 296 Taitokerau MB 177 (296 TTK 177) [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...Taitokerau MB 177 Biester v Trustees of Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 Ahu Whenua Trust - Te Ti B Part being Lot 17 DP 61631 (2025) 296 Taitokerau MB 177 (296 TTK 177) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAITOKERAU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Taitokerau District AP-20230000028245 | A20140009266 WĀHANGA Under Section 18(1)(a) and 21, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Te Ti B Part being Lot 17 DP 61631 I...

3. 2021-03-24 Transcript up to end of day 10 [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Judg

4. [2019] NZEmpC 153 Savage v Wai Shing Ltd [pdf, 545 KB]

   OLIVER SAVAGE v WAI SHING LIMITED [2019] NZEmpC 153 [1 November 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 153 EMPC 327/2019 IN THE MATTER OF an application for sanctions under s 140(6) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN OLIVER SAVAGE Plaintiff AND WAI SHING LIMITED First Defendant AND FRANKLYN WAI SHING Second Defendant He...

5. Waitangi Tribunal - The Whanganui district [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT 9 THE WHANGANUI DISTRICT SUZANNE CROSS AND BRIAN BARGH APRIL 1996 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 11A: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 13: The Northern South Island, Dr G A Phillipson FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys commi

6. [2025] NZEmpC 136 Tighe-Umbers v Jetconnect Limited [pdf, 223 KB]

   PHILIP TIGHE-UMBERS v JETCONNECT LIMITED [2025] NZEmpC 136 [4 July 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 136 EMPC 167/2024 EMPC 264/2024 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN PHILIP TIGHE-UMBERS Plaintiff AND JETCONNECT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 11-12 March 2025 (Heard at Auckland)...

7. Nga Uri a Maata Ngapo Charitable Trust v McLeod – Harataunga West 2B2A1 (2012) 49 Waikato Maniapoto MB 223 (49 WMN 223) [pdf, 169 KB]

   49 Waikato Maniapoto MB 223 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20090011664 UNDER Section 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Harataunga West 2B2A1 BETWEEN NGA URI A MAATA NGAPO CHARITABLE TRUST Applicant AND JOHN THORNTON MCLEOD and TE RŪNANGA O NGĀTI POROU KI HAURAKI Respondents Hearing: 19 October 2011 (held at Thames) 29 March 2012 (held at Hamilton) Appearances: Mr P F...

8. Bhana v Paniora - Wairau North 1B2C (2013) 69 Taitokerau 139 (69 TTK 139) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...the land and Bulla Paniora held the other 50 percent. (Bulla Paniora now holds all 75 percent of the balance interests). They agree that Barbara Bhana should have an occupation order but not on the site she has chosen. [3] The issues for me to address are whether the proposed site is appropriate and whether there is sufficient support for an occupation order. Background The land [4] Wairau North 1B2C comprises 9.6467 hectares and is situated at Waimamaku. The land was origin...

9. [2017] NZEmpC 84 The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development v Tuilaepa [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...Mr Tuilaepa’s description of the action of the Response Team is at odds with what they said and what the CCTV footage showed. In his statement he said he was replaced by the Response Team, giving the impression of a co-ordinated response to address a problem with YPA’s behaviour. However, the CCTV footage showed the Response Team directing their attention to removing Mr Tuilaepa from the room. [36] Ms Wiki was not satisfied. Having watched the CCTV footage she did not share...

10. LCRO 109/2023 W and F JM v EB and MK [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...protected by taking advice from the solicitor, however wrong the advice proved to be, and the solicitor would be protected by acting in accordance with the instruction which was given because of the incorrect advice. [66] In the same case, the Court addressed the onus of proof in the following terms: The onus of proof is on the person seeking compensation. By way of defence it is not necessary to show that the caveator actually had a valid claim of interest. This Court said recentl...