Search Results

1. [2021] NZACC 73 - McLennan v ACC (6 May 2021) [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...neurotoxicity. I note that Mr McLennan has not had any specific therapeutic input for neurotoxicity. There are a number of areas where he could be assisted to maintain or develop a better quality of life. It would help him if these areas could be addressed. [20] On 6 August 2018, the Reviewer dismissed Mr McLennan’s application for review. The Reviewer concluded that Mr McLennan had not established that he had sustained any physical injury as a result of exposure to glutaral...

2. Friesen v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury) [2024] NZACC 46 [pdf, 449 KB]

   ...23 January 2019 on suspension of entitlement was quashed. The reviewer wrote: On balance, I do not consider there is enough evidence on file to make an informed decision whether the meniscal tear was pre-existing, or if it was more likely a new and distinct injury. [18] The reviewer also noted: However, the mere presence of degeneration does not bar a claimant from cover or entitlements. The question is whether there was a new and distinct injury caused by accident whi...

3. Transcript (week 6 Cromwell) [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B

4. 2021-05-18 Transcript (up until end of day 28 - 14.05.2021) [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B

5. 2021-05-18 Transcript (up until end of day 28 - 14.05.2021) [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B

6. Transcript (week 6 Cromwell) [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B

7. [2020] NZEmpC 46 JCE v The Department of Corrections [pdf, 321 KB]

   JCE v THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS [2020] NZEmpC 46 [17 April 2020] ATTENTION IS DRAWN TO NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS MADE AT PARAGRAPH [93]. IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 46 EMPC 314/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JCE Plaintiff AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF T...

8. Rangahaua Whanui National Overview volume 2 [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   NATIONAL OVERVIEW volume i i Professor Alan Ward Waitangi Tribunal Rangahaua Whanui Series WAITANGI TRIBUNAL 1997 A Waitangi Tribunal publication © Copyright Waitangi Tribunal 1997 isbn 1-86956-208-9 Edited and produced by the Waitangi Tribunal Published by GP Publications, Wellington, New Zealand Printed by GP Print, Wellington, New Zealand Set in Times Roman This report was commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui research programme. Any views expr

9. Hall v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 6 [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...improve the weathertightness. Mr Hadley agreed with Mr Medricky that the re-design was necessary to achieve watertightness and on the basis of their evidence I accept that this solution was reasonable. [19] The Council disputes the cost of the new timber for this deck because Mr Rankine said that the existing timber could be re-used. Mr Hadley thought that the original timber may have had some residual value. In Mr White‘s view the labour was the most significant compon...

10. Tapu te Wao v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury) [2024] NZACC 137 (16 August 2024) [pdf, 246 KB]

    ...Ms Yvonne Kaveney, ACC Specialist Cover Assessor, noted: I called this morning to discuss your claim with you. You have two claims being looked at presently, but I am calling about your old right wrist injury sprain claim (10021128135) for which new information came in from your GP last year. Following discussion with you it was agreed that we would consider reassessment of the claim on the basis of failure to diagnose/delay diagnosis of fibro histiocytoma with subsequent major surgica...