8018 items matching your search terms
MARGOT ELIZABETH GAZELEY v OCEANIA GROUP (NZ) LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 234 [11 December 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 234 CRC 52/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to the determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MARGOT ELIZABETH GAZELEY Plaintiff AND OCEANIA GROUP (NZ) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 19-23, 26-29 August 2013 (Heard at Nelson) Appearances: Ms A Sh
RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT lIB HAWKE'S BAY DEAN COWIE SEPTEMBER 1996 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Ramer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District l1A: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 12: The Wellington District, Dr R Anderson and K Pickens District 13: The Nor
...NZEMPC 72 WRC 36/09 IN THE MATTER OF de novo challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CLIVE JOHN HORTON Plaintiff AND FONTERRA COOPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 17 March 2010 (Heard at New Plymouth) Appearances: Greg Lloyd, counsel for plaintiff Caroline McLorinan, counsel for defendant Judgment: 8 June 2010 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] The plaintiff, Mr Horton, has challenged a determination of the E...
...to the enactment of the Employment Relations Amendment Act (No 2) 2004 and, in particular, the enactment of what is now s103A of the principal Act. [6] The relevant principles were conveniently summarised by the Court of Appeal in W & H Newspapers Ltd v Oram [2000] 2 ERNZ 448. The onus is on the employer to justify the dismissal. What the employer must do is to satisfy the Court that the decision to dismiss was one which a reasonable and fair employer could have taken. Th...
...under an agreement for sale and purchase dated 21 December 1999 with a settlement of 28 January 2000. Mrs McDonald was also referred to in the evidence and documents as Justine Dando. [18] Mr McDonald said that he understood that the house was new as it had only recently received its code compliance certificate. He took confidence from the fact that it had been inspected only months before. Mr McDonald said that he obtained a LIM report and plans but failed to note that the h...
...the jurisdiction of the 1976 Act are also outside the jurisdiction of s 172 (Step 1); (b) only orders which could be made under the 1976 Act may be made under s 172 (Step 3). [67] Each of the three steps, as they apply to this case, will be addressed in turn. [68] Step 1 – Could have been complained about or charged under 1976 Act [69] Under rule 16.2 of the Rules of the Real Estate Institute of New Zealand Incorporated (―REINZ Rules‖), made under s 70 of the 1976 Act, an...
169 Gisborne MB 260 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRA WHTI DISTRICT Hearing: Judgment: A20040005895 UNDER Section 18 and 280, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waipiro A13 Blocks Incorporation - Investigation into Incorporation BETWEEN MILTON D HAIG WILLIAM K HAIG Applicants AND THE PROPRIETORS OF W AIPIRO A13 INCORPORATION Respondent 11 May 2006, 166 Gisborne MB 149-236 (Heard at Gisborne ) 21 December 2006 Appearances: Mr John Unsworth fo...
Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project VOLUME II - SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT APPENDIX 5: PROPOSED CONDITIONS 1 APPENDIX 5: PROPOSED CONDITIONS Designations, resource consents and applicable conditions The following tables list the designations, resource consents, the conditions, lapse periods and expiry dates that apply to each resource consent. Designations Reference Designation Applicable Conditions Lapse Period Horowhenu
Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project VOLUME II - SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT APPENDIX 5: PROPOSED CONDITIONS 1 APPENDIX 5: PROPOSED CONDITIONS Designations, resource consents and applicable conditions The following tables list the designations, resource consents, the conditions, lapse periods and expiry dates that apply to each resource consent. Designations Reference Designation Applicable Conditions Lapse Period Horowhenu
459 Aotea MB 210 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20220007002 A20220008582 A20220008583 WĀHANGA Under Sections 19, 231, 237, 238 and 338, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Ōuri 1A3 I WAENGA I A Between JAMES MOHI POKERE (i mate/deceased) and DONNA POKERE PHILLIPS Ngā kaitono Applicants Nohoanga: Hearing 1-2 Mahu