Search Results

Search results for new address for service .

8017 items matching your search terms

Search Disputes Tribunal only.

  1. Wickliffe v Pearce - Paengaroa North B4B and K Aggregated (2005) 289 Rotorua MB 236 (289 ROT 236) [pdf, 5.9 MB]

    Minute Book: 289 ROT 236 Place: Wellington Present: L R Harvey, Judge Date: 24 May 2005 Application No: A20040005137 Subject: Paengaroa North B4B & K Aggregated - Removal of trustees, Variation of trust order and Review of trust Legislation: Sections 231, 240,244 and 351, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 Counsel: Mr D S Dowthwaite for the Applicant, David Wickliffe Mr M A Gilbert & Ms N Khouri for Messrs Alroyce & Barry Pearce Mr C M Bidois for Mrs Keita Emery Hear

  2. Waitangi Tribunal theme Q - Inland waterways - lakes [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    R a n ga haua Wha n ui Nat i ona l Them e q I N L A N D WAT E RWAYS : L A K E S B E N W H I TE M arch 1 9 9 8 Fi rs t R ele ase WAI TA NGI T R I BU NA L R A NGA H AUA W H A N U I SE R I E S Other Rangahaua Whanui reports District reports District 1: Auckland (pt i), R Daamen, P Hamer, and Dr B Rigby; (pt ii), M Belgrave District 5b: Poverty Bay, S Daly District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B Bargh District 8: The Alienation of Maori Land in the Rohe Potae, C Marr District 9: T

  3. Waitangi Tribunal - District 11 Wairarapa [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT llA WAIRARAPA PAUL GOLDSMITH JUL Y 1996 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District 13: The Northern South Island, Dr G A Phillipson FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys conunissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal

  4. Donaldson v Hemi - Whaanga 1D 1D Roadway (2019) 188 Waikato-Maniapoto MB 142 (188 WMN 142) [pdf, 959 KB]

    ...block. Without a cross lease, counsel argued that Mr Hemi did not have exclusive use of these areas and could not unilaterally restrict the use of the common areas without permission from the Ritchie family. [27] Counsel also filed submissions addressing the proposed use of the G track as an alternative accessway. Mr Neverman contended that the use of the G track would restrict the applicants from their full legal entitlement over the roadway. He noted that the G track is appro...

  5. Mokaraka - Waima C8 (2019) Chief Judge's MB 1137 (2019 CJ 1137) [pdf, 419 KB]

    2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1137 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20170001815 CJ 2017/5 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Pani Mokaraka and a succession order and order determining ownership of a dwelling house on Waima C8 block made at 2 Kaikohe (Succession) MB 32-33 on 31 March 1993 BETWEEN MIHA MAIHI MOKARAKA, ANNE EDITH FORSTER THOMSON, IDA MORGAN, JOHN MOKARAKA, BARNEY PANI MOKARAKA, DAVID RUDOLPH...

  6. Beker v Accident Compensation Corporation Costs on Review and Weekly Compensation [2023] NZACC 12 [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...This would then lead to a situation, if the secondary difficulty was not initially considered, it would not be able to be included in the future in respect to reassessment. [45] Her Honour also found that the assessing doctor had not adequately addressed the job detail sheets in considering Mr Cowley’s functional restrictions. [46] Mr Winter produced a letter dated 10 June 2014 from consultant neurosurgeon, Professor De Ridder who said this of the appellant: The suprascapula...

  7. Lee v Auckland Council [2016] NZWHT Auckland 2 [pdf, 317 KB]

    ...cladding system would not be approved. [19] On 4 March 2004 the Council wrote to Mr Kim advising that it could not be satisfied that the cladding system as installed would meet the functional requirements of clause E2 External Moisture of the New Zealand Building Code and would therefore be unable to issue a CCC. [20] On 16 November 2004 the Lees agreed to purchase the house from Mr Choi and Ms Woun. Prior to doing so they sought legal advice and had a friend who was an eng...

  8. Morris v Accident Compensation Corporation (Suspension of entitlements) [2024] NZACC 144 (2 September 2024) [pdf, 452 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 144 ACAR 163/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN J MORRIS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 7 March 2024 Heard at: Wellington / Te Whanganui-a-Tara Appearances: Ms M Bagnall for appellant Mr J Sumner for respondent Judgment: 2 September 2024 ______

  9. [2024] NZEmpC 125 Cronin-Lampe v Minister of Education [pdf, 607 KB]

    KATHLEEN CRONIN-LAMPE v MINISTER OF EDUCATION (IN RESPECT OF THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION) [2024] NZEmpC 125 [10 July 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 125 ARC 55/2013 ARC 79/2013 ARC 48/2014 ARC 25/2014 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations A...

  10. Matthews v Matthews - Estate of Graham Ngahina Matthews (2010) 253 Aotea MB 250 (253 AOT 250) [pdf, 200 KB]

    ...(Emphasis added) [41] Section 152(1)(d) contemplates situations where consideration, in the strict sense, is not relevant. That said, a gift may include conditions. But once it includes money, some other form of payment or an exchange for goods or services then the definition of gift no longer applies. Such a transaction would then take on the appearance of something more than a gift, for example, a conditional gift, an exchange or sale. [42] The argument that there should be com...