CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 256 APPLICANT KI Limited RESPONDENT TS The Tribunal orders: TS is to pay KI Ltd $1,615.44 by Wednesday 5 July 2023, being $1555.44 for three orders and $60.00 for chargeback fees. Reasons: 1. KI Limited trading as K is a supplier of fish, plants and reptiles based in [City]. 2. TS placed three orders with KI. The first...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 185 APPLICANT CV RESPONDENT IT The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. IT and FS contracted CV to erect a kitset [Supplier] cabin on their property in [Suburb]. 2. At that time CV’s details were listed on the “Find a builder or tradesperson” page on [Supplier]’s website. 3. CV ca...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 297 APPLICANT KA RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 3 April 2023, KA paid a $500.00 ‘holding deposit’ on a 2014 BMW 320i GT that was for sale on L Ltd’s yard. 2. KA paid a further deposit of $2,500.00 on 11 April 2023. 3. KA decided to not proceed with the purc...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 276 APPLICANT TO FIRST RESPONDENT ZY & KX SECOND RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: ZY & KX and M Ltd jointly and severally liable to pay directly to TO the sum of $745.00 on or before 22 August 2023. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. All parties appeared at the...
...The Tribunal orders: SI is to pay BL $2,239.00 on or before 26 April 2024. Reasons: 1. BL did some work as a contractor for SI on a farm SI was leasing from her parents. 2. BL now claims $2,239.00 from SI for work done in July 2023. 3. SI denies the claim on the basis that BL did not do any work for him in July 2023. 4. The issues I have to consider are: a. What was agreed about the work and the hourly rate? b. Was the agreement breached or ended by either pa...
...The Tribunal orders: 1. B Ltd is joined as an applicant to this claim. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In October 2022, B Ltd provided a quote to SU for the re-roofing of a property in [Town]. 2. Between February and April 2023 there were some further discussions between the parties regarding the work and the price. 3. The work was carried out and on 6 July 2023, B Ltd sent an invoice to SU which was paid in full without delay. 4. In August 2023, SU re...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 106 APPLICANT KN RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: KN is to pay $5,800.00 to T Ltd on or before 20 March 2023. REASONS Brief Details of Claims 1. KN owns a property at [Address]. KN submitted an Application for Resource Consent to subdivide the property into three lots. There was an existing house on the propo...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 658 APPLICANT C Ltd RESPONDENT V Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LV The Tribunal orders: V Ltd and LV (jointly and severally) are to pay C Ltd $6,342.86 by 13 December 2023. Background 1. This is one of two claims brought by [C Ltd], the owner of commercial premises at [Address], against the former tenant of those premises,...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 752 APPLICANT QL RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QL purchased two laminated Gortex motorcycle jackets from E Ltd on 2 February 2022, one for himself and one for a friend. 2. On 4 July 2023, QL was out on a 3 day ride and noticed that a small patch on the front of one of the wrist cuffs had d...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 639 APPLICANT BU RESPONDENT CU APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BU and CU were involved in an accident in the carpark at the [shop] in [City] on 25 January 2023. 2. Both drivers were attempting to exit the car park. 3. BU was parked in an...