CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 583 APPLICANT DI RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. DI’s application is dismissed. Reasons 2. In October 2022 DI purchased a [bike model 1] from U Ltd, which trades as DT, and is a retailer of bicycles. The bike has failed while being ridden, sustaining frame damage. DI claims the bike was not fit for purpose and seeks a refund...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 749 APPLICANT KX RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. KX’ claim is dismissed. Reasons 2. KX’s son plays in-line hockey, at inter-regional level. In line hockey is a sport similar to ice hockey, but is played using in-line skates, on a surface of plastic in line hockey tiles. 3. On 30 April 2023, KX purchased a composite ho...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 65 APPLICANT ST RESPONDENT PS Ltd The Tribunal orders: PS Ltd is to pay the sum of $359.73 to ST by no later than 31 March 2023. Reasons: 1. ST and his family used a buggy in an [off-road excursion] with PS Ltd in September 2022. ST signed a waiver that he would be liable if causing damage to the buggy. 2...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 789 APPLICANT KG RESPONDENT TQ The Tribunal orders: TQ is to pay KG the sum of $1,150.00 on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons: 1. In March 2023 KG engaged TQ to prune and shape some trees. He carried out the work and then the parties discussed two other trees on her property that may need removing. TQ asked for $750.00 in ad...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 399 APPLICANT DF RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by DF is dismissed. 2. LH is removed as the respondent party and H Ltd is added as the respondent party. Reasons 1. In June 2023, DF’s family stayed for one night at the [accommodation provider] operated by H Ltd. A charge of $179 for the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 559 APPLICANT QD Ltd RESPONDENT SI APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. SI is to pay QD Ltd’s insurer J Ltd, $4543.05 on or before 30 November 2023. Reasons: 1. Mr X, a director of QD Ltd, and SI were involved in a motor vehicle collision. Mr X was reversing from a driveway into [road] and sa...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 590 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim ZA as trustee for HG Trust RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against LM Limited Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order 14 August 2023 of stands. Reasons for decision: 1. TC appeared as a presentative of LM Ltd. 2. TC is seeking...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 541 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT MDC The Tribunal orders: MDC is to deliver DC’s house keys to her letterbox at the agreed address by Thursday 12 October 2023; and The balance of the claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. DC and MDC are estranged family members, whose mother was seriously ill before passing away in late October 2022....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 353 APPLICANT PR RESPONDENT Z Ltd The Tribunal orders: Z Ltd is to pay PR $7,039.08 by 30 June 2023. Reasons 1. PR claims a full refund of the fees he paid Z Ltd for his enrolment in a [Course] at its [City] campus last year. The amount PR claims is $7,821.20. 2. Z Ltd has emphasised PR did not make it clear...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 228 APPLICANT TM RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by TM against B Ltd is struck out. Reasons 1. TM travelled by air from [International city 1] via [International city 2] to [NZ city]. The [International city 2] to [NZ city] leg of his journey was operated by B Ltd. A dispute has arisen in relation...