CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 674 APPLICANT WD RESPONDENT HT The Tribunal orders: HT shall pay WD $4,935.00 by 27 November 2023. Reasons: 1. On 6 April 2023, WD purchased a 2006 caravan from HT for $28,000.00 via [online website]. WD relied on HT’s listing description, photos, a video and a pre-purchase inspection by a mechanic when he agreed to purchase the ca...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 549 APPLICANT BT Ltd RESPONDENT XN The Tribunal orders: XN is to pay $5701.05 to BT Ltd on or before 8 November 2023. Reasons 1. XN entered into a written storage agreement with BT Ltd (‘BT’) in June 2007 and had paid a monthly rental ever since to store belongings in a unit at their facility. 2. In around 2017 when t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 321 APPLICANT JB RESPONDENT IQ The Tribunal orders: 1. The respondent’s name is corrected to IQ. 2. IQ is to pay the sum of $1,900.00 to JB on or before Monday 31 July 2023. 3. Once payment has been made, IQ is to collect the car from JB at a mutually convenient time within the next two weeks. If the car has not been...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 262 APPLICANT BE RESPONDENT MG The Tribunal orders: 1. MG is to pay BE $19,000.00 on or before 11 July 2023. 2. The balance of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. In April 2022, BE and MG entered into a loan agreement where MG borrowed $29,000 from BE to purchase a [car] registration [number...
...Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant seeks payment for printing and distribution services under invoices 178307 and 178407 dated 20 October 2023 in the amount of $23,369.15. [3] The respondent admits the work and that it agreed by way of written estimate no 227458 dated 7 August 2023 to pay invoice 178307 but claims it has a defence against paying this amount as it was overcharged u...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 396 APPLICANT NH Ltd RESPONDENT OZ Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. OZ Ltd must pay NH Ltd $28,437.56 by 4pm on 30 August 2023. 2. OZ Ltd’s counterclaim against NH Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant provided weekly garden and ground maintenance services to the respondent for a property at [addr...
...$187.17 (incl GST) (invoice from G Ltd dated 12 June 2020). SU engaged HS (“the Electrician”) to fit the element and regulator into the Cooktop at a cost of $149.04 (incl GST) (invoice from the Electrician dated 18 June 2020). 2. In February 2023, the Cooktop failed again, and SU purchased another [new parts] kit from G Ltd at a cost of $152.99 (incl GST) (G Ltd order confirmation dated 10 March 2023). SU engaged the Electrician to fit the element and related parts (including new r...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 445 APPLICANT HM RESPONDENT F The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. HM is a member of the F [airline loyalty programme] under which a member may earn [loyalty points] (Points) when flying with F. She says on 31 December 2022 F cancelled 187,928 of her Points without any war...
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 340 APPLICANT NP RESPONDENT KM The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim for refund of the purchase price of the saddle is dismissed. 2. KM will arrange for the return of the saddle to NP by no later than 10 July 2023. KM and NP will share equally in the (reasonable) costs of returning the saddle (as set out in paragraph 19 below). Background 1. The...
...RESPONDENT Z Ltd The Tribunal orders: Z Ltd is to pay $8,610.17 to W Ltd before 19 April 2024. Reasons 1. Z Ltd approached W Ltd regarding having a large format digital billboard placed on its premises at [location]. 2. On 21 June 2023 W Ltd provided to Z Ltd, by email, the estimated costs for gaining resource consent. UV for Z Ltd responded, by email, ‘yes please proceed the application’. 3. W Ltd claims $8,790.17 from Z Ltd made up as follows: a. Invoic...