CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 441 APPLICANT TQ and BC RESPONDENT B Transport The Tribunal orders: B Transport is to pay $843.09 to TQ and BC on or before 27 September 2023. Reasons 1. TQ and BC, in their EV vehicle, approached the [Carpark], operated by B Transport, on the evening of Friday 26 May 2023. There was a barrier at the top of...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 331 APPLICANT HD RESPONDENT NN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. HD and NN were neighbours until recently. HD says that NN has caused damage to his property and made an application for a restraining order against him which required him to incur legal fees. HD seeks an order that NN is lia...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 636 APPLICANT QI APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT P Ltd The Tribunal orders: P Ltd is to pay QI and UD $3,900.00 on or before 19 December 2023. Reasons 1. QI and UD engaged P Ltd to complete plastering of the ceiling and walls for their lounge, hallway and bedroom at a price of $6,694.35. The instruction was to provide a plastered sur...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 664 APPLICANT QF Ltd RESPONDENT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: I Ltd is to pay QF Ltd the sum of $776.89 on or before 19 October 2023. Reasons: 1. I Ltd engaged QF Ltd to do some work on the hydraulic hoses for a truck. The work was carried out, but the truck not tested as there were also other tradespeople working on the electrics of...
...ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 238 APPLICANT NX Ltd RESPONDENT BH Ltd The Tribunal orders: BH Ltd is to make the [metal] profile belonging to NX Ltd available for collection on or before 28 January 2023 – the onus is on BH Ltd to show that it has arranged or vigorously attempted to arrange reasonable access for NX Ltd to collect the product; and BH Ltd is to pay NX Ltd the sum of $1104.00 on or before 28 January 2023; and If NX Ltd...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 52 APPLICANT MJ RESPONDENT OM Ltd The Tribunal orders: OM Ltd is to pay the sum of $6,162.46 to MJ on or before Tuesday 14 March 2023. Reasons: 1. On 23 October 2021, MJ purchased a robotic vacuum cleaner from OM Ltd for $2,399.20 plus $209.99 for an extended warranty. She claims that the vacuum started failing to pick...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 362 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT NG Ltd The Tribunal orders: NG Ltd is to pay KD the sum of $3,417.97 on or before 1 August 2023. Reasons: 1. In August 2021 KD went to NG Ltd to get some vinyl planking for his floor. NG Ltd’s representative, Mr L, did a site visit and measured the area, and pointed out some work t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 573 APPLICANT ZC RESPONDENT N Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT UI The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. ZC purchased a used [bus] from N Ltd in February 2023. He bought the bus sight unseen from overseas. Upon arrival in New Zealand, he paid the price and took possession. He then commenced driving the vehicle to the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 319 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: Application dismissed Reasons On 19 October 2022, BT visited the respondent’s electronic ticketing website and booked a flight to [Country 1] transiting via [City 1] in the [Country 2]. He paid...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 323 APPLICANT ZZ RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Reasons 1. In August 2022 ZZ engaged W Ltd to construct a new concrete driveway at his property. L Ltd was the supplier of the concrete under a contract with W Ltd. Soon after completion of the work, ZZ notic...