CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 39 APPLICANT NJ APPLICANT SE RESPONDENT KN SECOND RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: The claim and counterclaim are dismissed. Reasons: 1. NJ and SE own the property at [Address 1]. Their neighbours, KN and EN, own [Address 2]. These properties are two of four that are accessed via a shared driveway. Th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 30 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT CH The Tribunal orders: BT’s claim against CH is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The parties lived together for a period of time. The applicant claims the respondent agreed to make payments to him or contribute towards living expenses each week in lieu of rent and other costs. The applicant claims...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 570 APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT PO Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TN responded to a [online marketplace] listing for a Ps5 at a promo price of $450.00. The seller referred to themselves as PO Ltd. During a series of online interactions, and for a variety of reasons given by the seller, TN en...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 444 APPLICANT SL RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In February 2022, SL started [treatment 1] and then [treatment 2] treatment by T Ltd for fat reduction around her abdomen. She was unhappy with the results and found [treatment 2] painful. 2. SL now seeks a refund of the $4...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 172 APPLICANT PV RESPONDENT OS SECOND RESPONDENT B Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: OS and B Ltd is to pay J Ltd $3,922.28 by Wednesday 7 June 2023. Reasons Background 1. PV was in the left hand lane at a roundabout and OS was on the right lane at th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 168 APPLICANT BS RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by BS against O Ltd is partially proved. It is declared by the Disputes Tribunal that BS does not have to pay O Ltd the sum of $468.00. Reasons 1. In October 2018 O Ltd slipped BS’s boat for maintenance. BS now brings a claim against O Ltd for a d...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 748 APPLICANT NU RESPONDENT OA The Tribunal orders: The claim by NU against OA is partially proved. OA is to pay NU the sum of $590.58 on or by 5:00 pm on 20 January 2024. Reasons 1. On 13 February 2023 (after storm Gabrielle) at around 10:30 am, NU (the applicant) found that a large Jacaranda tree (the tree) had crashed over...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 627 APPLICANT KG RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is to pay $300.00 to KG by 20 November 2023. Reasons Did M Ltd fail to provide a moving service it promised? 1. KG contracted M Ltd to carry her household goods from [city] to [town]. She was needing to give vacant possession for the property she was leaving and expe...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 645 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. G Ltd is to pay $2,139.00 to SN on or before 4pm 13 November 2023. Reasons: 2. In April 2022 SN engaged G Ltd to supply plumbing services in her house for which she was invoiced for $3,017.63. SN said the shower tray was not levelled when it was installed and as a resu...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 648 APPLICANT EX APPLICANT OI RESPONDENT D Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT BD The Tribunal orders: The claim by EX and OI against D Ltd and BD is dismissed. Reasons 1. In January 2023 EX purchased a [redacted] racing engine. EX now brings a claim against D Ltd and BD for $30,000.00. 2. EX purchased a racing engine f...