CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 23 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT SC The Tribunal orders: SC is to pay DT $3,040.60 on or before Friday 17 February 2023. Reasons: 1. DT says it mistakenly made payment to a company associated with SC. The company, known as B Ltd, had previously been a debtor of DT, and had legitimately received payments. In...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 56 QS SQ The Tribunal orders: SQ is to pay QS $790.00 on or before 21 March 2023. Reasons 1. QS responded to an advertisement placed on TradeMe by SQ for a room in a house to rent. He met with SQ on 27 November 2022 and discussed the property. They travelled to the property for QS to look at it and they agreed tha...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 356 APPLICANT LT RESPONDENT OT Ltd The Tribunal orders: OT Ltd must pay LT $2,114.10 by 4pm on 13 June 2023. Reasons: 1. The applicant purchased a sofa from the respondent and arranged for it to be delivered by the respondent. When the sofa came to be delivered, the people delivering it were unable to deliver...
Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 594 APPLICANT KE RESPONDENT OT and NT The Tribunal orders: Please also email Application struck out. Reasons 1. This was a claim filed by applicant, as executor of the estate of his late elderly father Q (known as “Q”). 2. On behalf of the estate, the applican...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 270 APPLICANT IS RESPONDENT TM The Tribunal orders: TM is to pay IS the sum of $3,110.00 on or before 15 June 2023. Reasons: 1. IS moved into a flat with TM and other flatmates in November 2020. She paid a bond to TM who was the head tenant. They did not have a written sharing agreement, however, IS understood that...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 180 APPLICANT SQ RESPONDENT KL SECOND RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by SQ against KL is dismissed. 2. The claim by SQ against L Ltd is proved and L Ltd is to pay SQ the sum of $13,820.00 on or by 5:00 pm on 15 July 2023. 3. The counterclaim by L Ltd against SQ is dismissed. Reasons 1....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 222 APPLICANT NC and DC RESPONDENT T Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT HG The Tribunal orders: 1. T Ltd is to pay NC and DC $3100.25 on or before 5pm on 19 June 2023. 2. HG is struck off this claim. Reasons 1. The first hearing was adjourned. After that hearing, T Ltd and HG contacted the Tribunal and request...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 101 APPLICANT ND Ltd RESPONDENT TS Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT BG Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT SQ The Tribunal orders: 1. TS Ltd is to pay ND Ltd $2,040.00 on or before 12 May 2023. 2. The claims against BG Ltd and SQ are dismissed. Reasons: 1. ND Ltd hired a vehicle from TS Ltd. Durin...
...TU signed an agreement to lease a new [car] from TG Limited trading as SF for a period of three years. The lease required a weekly rental payment of $99.00, with four weeks paid in advance at the start of the lease. At the end of the lease on 20 May 2023, TU would have the option of making a residual payment of $3,000.00 to take the vehicle over as his own. 2. On 22 February 2022, TU called TG Ltd’s director SC to ask for a statement of account, as he wanted to release the full paymen...
1 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 391 APPLICANT HC RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: X Ltd is to pay $7,889.57 to HC on or before Friday 13 October 2023. Reasons: 1. In December 2019 HC purchased a house owned by X Ltd by auction. Prior to the marketing of the property the vendor renovated an upstairs ensuite bathroom and a downstairs bathroom. Both bathrooms had identical...