CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 147 APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT BF RESPONDENT F Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT DF The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 22 February 2017, TT entered into a property management agreement (the Management Agreement) with F Ltd for them to manage her property at [Address]. 2. For t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 158 APPLICANT BU RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. BU purchased a [car] from B Ltd for $5,250.00. He understood the car was registered as a seven seater car. BU has a large family and was in the market to buy a car that could fit his family. After he purchased the car, he d...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 560 APPLICANT LD RESPONDENT BD Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT BT Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim against BD Ltd is withdrawn. The claim against BT Ltd is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by telephone. All parties appeared at the hearing. [2] LD and his insurer, BJ Ltd confirm they wish to withdraw t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 486 APPLICANT WC RESPONDENT HM The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. When WC moved in with her partner at [address] in February 2022, she formed a bond with a young white and ginger tabby tom cat who regularly visited her. She called him P and said the window was left open for him to come a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 501 APPLICANT EN RESPONDENT B The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. EN had his bag stolen while in a shop in the departure lounge at [International airport]. On his return to New Zealand, he made a travel insurance claim and that was declined. 2. EN claims $1,102.20 for the property s...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 226 APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SI has income protection insurance with B Ltd. In April 2021 he injured his right foot during his job as a plumber. He visited a podiatrist over a number of months and carried on working as best he could. 2. The inju...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 86 APPLICANT ST RESPONDENT SC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Vehicles driven by ST and SC on a race-track at the [Race] in [Town] in November 2022 were involved in a collision. 2. ST alleges that SC was driving negligently and claims $5,230.00 from him made up as follows: a. Cost o...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 717 APPLICANT LN RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The applicant’s name has been corrected from [redacted] to [redacted]. 2. The respondent has been renamed to reflect the contracting company – B Ltd. 3. The claim is dismissed. Reason Is the respondent required to provide a refund? 1. LN has made a claim tha...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 705 APPLICANT KG RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. D Ltd is to pay KG $1,237.00 on or before 5.00pm on 19 January 2024. Reasons 1. KG engaged the services of D Ltd to move her furniture from storage to her new place of residence. When the furniture was delivered, she later found that her China cabinet was damaged, with the intern...
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 341 APPLICANT O Ltd RESPONDENT TO The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. This claim was originally a counter-claim to a claim brought by TO with respect to bathroom renovations carried out at her property by EO. 2. In trying to track down a company and/or an address associated with EO, in order to bring her Disputes Tribunal cl...